Using symptom-based case predictions to identify host genetic factors that contribute to COVID-19 susceptibility.

Epidemiological and genetic studies on COVID-19 are currently hindered by inconsistent and limited testing policies to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recently, it was shown that it is possible to predict COVID-19 cases using cross-sectional self-reported disease-related symptoms. Here, we demonstrate...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irene V van Blokland, Pauline Lanting, Anil P S Ori, Judith M Vonk, Robert C A Warmerdam, Johanna C Herkert, Floranne Boulogne, Annique Claringbould, Esteban A Lopera-Maya, Meike Bartels, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Andrea Ganna, Juha Karjalainen, Lifelines COVID-19 cohort study, COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, Caroline Hayward, Chloe Fawns-Ritchie, Archie Campbell, David Porteous, Elizabeth T Cirulli, Kelly M Schiabor Barrett, Stephen Riffle, Alexandre Bolze, Simon White, Francisco Tanudjaja, Xueqing Wang, Jimmy M Ramirez, Yan Wei Lim, James T Lu, Nicole L Washington, Eco J C de Geus, Patrick Deelen, H Marike Boezen, Lude H Franke
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f56d0cd40e374f90802e5b2a9b90049e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Epidemiological and genetic studies on COVID-19 are currently hindered by inconsistent and limited testing policies to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recently, it was shown that it is possible to predict COVID-19 cases using cross-sectional self-reported disease-related symptoms. Here, we demonstrate that this COVID-19 prediction model has reasonable and consistent performance across multiple independent cohorts and that our attempt to improve upon this model did not result in improved predictions. Using the existing COVID-19 prediction model, we then conducted a GWAS on the predicted phenotype using a total of 1,865 predicted cases and 29,174 controls. While we did not find any common, large-effect variants that reached genome-wide significance, we do observe suggestive genetic associations at two SNPs (rs11844522, p = 1.9x10-7; rs5798227, p = 2.2x10-7). Explorative analyses furthermore suggest that genetic variants associated with other viral infectious diseases do not overlap with COVID-19 susceptibility and that severity of COVID-19 may have a different genetic architecture compared to COVID-19 susceptibility. This study represents a first effort that uses a symptom-based predicted phenotype as a proxy for COVID-19 in our pursuit of understanding the genetic susceptibility of the disease. We conclude that the inclusion of symptom-based predicted cases could be a useful strategy in a scenario of limited testing, either during the current COVID-19 pandemic or any future viral outbreak.