Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study ai...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glenn P. Boyles, MD, Ashlee M. Weaver, MD, David E. Cohn, MD, Floor J. Backes, MD, Larry J. Copeland, MD, Kristin L. Bixel, MD, Jeffrey M. Fowler, MD, David M. O'Malley, MD, Casey M. Cosgrove, MD
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f57c139424c749ec9c35a0f3f9c75843
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f57c139424c749ec9c35a0f3f9c75843
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f57c139424c749ec9c35a0f3f9c758432021-11-20T05:14:43ZWound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance2666-577810.1016/j.xagr.2021.100022https://doaj.org/article/f57c139424c749ec9c35a0f3f9c758432021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577821000204https://doaj.org/toc/2666-5778BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the rate of wound complications following simple vulvar excision and to identify the risk factors for these outcomes. Our secondary objectives were to determine the rates of (1) positive margins and (2) occult carcinoma in the cases of vulvar dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent simple vulvar excision procedures for suspected premalignant or benign lesions between June 2016 and February 2020. Our primary outcome was the rate of composite wound complications, including wound separation or breakdown, infection, or hematoma. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of (1) margins positive for residual dysplasia and (2) occult minimally invasive carcinoma. The Fisher exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the categorical variables and logistic regression models and independent student t tests were used for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate stepwise selection and multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for complications and generate the odds ratios. RESULTS: Of the 338 patients included in the study, 143 (42.3%) experienced wound complication. Most of these complications were wound separation or breakdown (n=134, 39.6%), followed by infection (n=22, 6.5%), and hematoma (n=4, 1.2%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of high-grade vulvar dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–3.15), longer specimen diameter (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.05), and lesion location on the perineum (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.38–3.66) were independent risk factors. With high-grade vulvar dysplasia, the rate of positive margins was 50.2% (114/227) and that of occult microinvasive carcinoma was 17.2% (39/227). Notably, the primary and secondary outcomes were similar among gynecologic oncologists and gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions are common. Select groups may benefit from anticipatory counseling and future interventional studies to prevent complication. The incidence of positive surgical margins and occult minimally invasive carcinoma is also high, reflecting the challenging nature of treating vulvar disease.Glenn P. Boyles, MDAshlee M. Weaver, MDDavid E. Cohn, MDFloor J. Backes, MDLarry J. Copeland, MDKristin L. Bixel, MDJeffrey M. Fowler, MDDavid M. O'Malley, MDCasey M. Cosgrove, MDElsevierarticlegynecologic surgical proceduresmarginspostoperative complicationrisk factorssimple partial vulvectomyvulvar carcinomaGynecology and obstetricsRG1-991ENAJOG Global Reports, Vol 1, Iss 4, Pp 100022- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic gynecologic surgical procedures
margins
postoperative complication
risk factors
simple partial vulvectomy
vulvar carcinoma
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
spellingShingle gynecologic surgical procedures
margins
postoperative complication
risk factors
simple partial vulvectomy
vulvar carcinoma
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
Glenn P. Boyles, MD
Ashlee M. Weaver, MD
David E. Cohn, MD
Floor J. Backes, MD
Larry J. Copeland, MD
Kristin L. Bixel, MD
Jeffrey M. Fowler, MD
David M. O'Malley, MD
Casey M. Cosgrove, MD
Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the rate of wound complications following simple vulvar excision and to identify the risk factors for these outcomes. Our secondary objectives were to determine the rates of (1) positive margins and (2) occult carcinoma in the cases of vulvar dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent simple vulvar excision procedures for suspected premalignant or benign lesions between June 2016 and February 2020. Our primary outcome was the rate of composite wound complications, including wound separation or breakdown, infection, or hematoma. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of (1) margins positive for residual dysplasia and (2) occult minimally invasive carcinoma. The Fisher exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the categorical variables and logistic regression models and independent student t tests were used for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate stepwise selection and multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for complications and generate the odds ratios. RESULTS: Of the 338 patients included in the study, 143 (42.3%) experienced wound complication. Most of these complications were wound separation or breakdown (n=134, 39.6%), followed by infection (n=22, 6.5%), and hematoma (n=4, 1.2%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of high-grade vulvar dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–3.15), longer specimen diameter (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.05), and lesion location on the perineum (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.38–3.66) were independent risk factors. With high-grade vulvar dysplasia, the rate of positive margins was 50.2% (114/227) and that of occult microinvasive carcinoma was 17.2% (39/227). Notably, the primary and secondary outcomes were similar among gynecologic oncologists and gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions are common. Select groups may benefit from anticipatory counseling and future interventional studies to prevent complication. The incidence of positive surgical margins and occult minimally invasive carcinoma is also high, reflecting the challenging nature of treating vulvar disease.
format article
author Glenn P. Boyles, MD
Ashlee M. Weaver, MD
David E. Cohn, MD
Floor J. Backes, MD
Larry J. Copeland, MD
Kristin L. Bixel, MD
Jeffrey M. Fowler, MD
David M. O'Malley, MD
Casey M. Cosgrove, MD
author_facet Glenn P. Boyles, MD
Ashlee M. Weaver, MD
David E. Cohn, MD
Floor J. Backes, MD
Larry J. Copeland, MD
Kristin L. Bixel, MD
Jeffrey M. Fowler, MD
David M. O'Malley, MD
Casey M. Cosgrove, MD
author_sort Glenn P. Boyles, MD
title Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
title_short Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
title_full Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
title_fullStr Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
title_full_unstemmed Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
title_sort wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesionsajog global reports at a glance
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f57c139424c749ec9c35a0f3f9c75843
work_keys_str_mv AT glennpboylesmd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT ashleemweavermd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT davidecohnmd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT floorjbackesmd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT larryjcopelandmd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT kristinlbixelmd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT jeffreymfowlermd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT davidmomalleymd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
AT caseymcosgrovemd woundcomplicationsfollowingvulvarexcisionfornonmalignantlesionsajogglobalreportsataglance
_version_ 1718419517797826560