Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral

This research deals with the role of the authors in the field of management in their publications and what factors may influence the ordering of the authors in their publications, we also propose a method to measure author ordering. There are three factors influencing author ordering: (1) career exp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lucas Daniel Ramos Ribeiro, José Eduardo Storopoli, Julio Araujo Carneiro da Cunha
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	PT
Publicado:	Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 2019
Materias:	co authorship author positions academic background research in management Economic growth, development, planning HD72-88
Acceso en línea:	https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2019.48.52-70 https://doaj.org/article/f602ebbce9c3401f8036c1bd637b0de0
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f602ebbce9c3401f8036c1bd637b0de0
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f602ebbce9c3401f8036c1bd637b0de02021-11-11T15:16:09ZCoautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral1678-48552237-6453https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2019.48.52-70https://doaj.org/article/f602ebbce9c3401f8036c1bd637b0de02019-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75260400004https://doaj.org/toc/1678-4855https://doaj.org/toc/2237-6453This research deals with the role of the authors in the field of management in their publications and what factors may influence the ordering of the authors in their publications, we also propose a method to measure author ordering. There are three factors influencing author ordering: (1) career experience; (2) leadership in research groups; and (3) academic background. We analyzed 16 postgraduate programs in management in the state of São Paulo – Brazil, an extant of 329 scholars and more than 2,200 publications. The results show that both scholars’ experience, leadership in research group, and academic background lead them to act more as a manager (last author) than as an executor (first author) in their publications. We conclude that, currently, the scores on researchers made by Capes every four years, and the others used by educational institutions in the area of administration, do not differentiate the author in his position in the article. This posture brings benefits and disadvantages. The main benefit is to avoid opportunistic behavior among authors in the definition of authorship order; the main disadvantage is that the distinct efforts of each author in the performance of the scientific work are not differentiated.Lucas Daniel Ramos RibeiroJosé Eduardo StoropoliJulio Araujo Carneiro da CunhaUniversidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sularticlecoauthorshipauthor positionsacademic backgroundresearch in managementEconomic growth, development, planningHD72-88PTDesenvolvimento em Questão, Vol 17, Iss 48, Pp 52-70 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	PT
topic	co authorship author positions academic background research in management Economic growth, development, planning HD72-88
spellingShingle	co authorship author positions academic background research in management Economic growth, development, planning HD72-88 Lucas Daniel Ramos Ribeiro José Eduardo Storopoli Julio Araujo Carneiro da Cunha Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral
description	This research deals with the role of the authors in the field of management in their publications and what factors may influence the ordering of the authors in their publications, we also propose a method to measure author ordering. There are three factors influencing author ordering: (1) career experience; (2) leadership in research groups; and (3) academic background. We analyzed 16 postgraduate programs in management in the state of São Paulo – Brazil, an extant of 329 scholars and more than 2,200 publications. The results show that both scholars’ experience, leadership in research group, and academic background lead them to act more as a manager (last author) than as an executor (first author) in their publications. We conclude that, currently, the scores on researchers made by Capes every four years, and the others used by educational institutions in the area of administration, do not differentiate the author in his position in the article. This posture brings benefits and disadvantages. The main benefit is to avoid opportunistic behavior among authors in the definition of authorship order; the main disadvantage is that the distinct efforts of each author in the performance of the scientific work are not differentiated.
format	article
author	Lucas Daniel Ramos Ribeiro José Eduardo Storopoli Julio Araujo Carneiro da Cunha
author_facet	Lucas Daniel Ramos Ribeiro José Eduardo Storopoli Julio Araujo Carneiro da Cunha
author_sort	Lucas Daniel Ramos Ribeiro
title	Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral
title_short	Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral
title_full	Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral
title_fullStr	Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral
title_full_unstemmed	Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral
title_sort	coautoria em administração: uma análise da posição autoral
publisher	Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
publishDate	2019
url	https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2019.48.52-70 https://doaj.org/article/f602ebbce9c3401f8036c1bd637b0de0
work_keys_str_mv	AT lucasdanielramosribeiro coautoriaemadministracaoumaanalisedaposicaoautoral AT joseeduardostoropoli coautoriaemadministracaoumaanalisedaposicaoautoral AT julioaraujocarneirodacunha coautoriaemadministracaoumaanalisedaposicaoautoral
_version_	1718435792146137088

Coautoria em Administração: Uma Análise da Posição Autoral

Ejemplares similares