Arturo, Sandra, Poli and Cecilia: four paradigmatic cases of Argentine jurisprudence
The present essay aims to demonstrate in four paradigmatic cases, how the Argentine jurisprudential law, through the judgments of different courts of diverse hierarchy, have marked a dividing line from which to support the animals within the legal category of " things "is, at least, contra...
Enregistré dans:
Auteur principal: | Gustavo Federico de Baggis |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN ES |
Publié: |
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Dret
2017
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/f6109b270333484c86262d297eca0e0b |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Solicitud de Hábeas Corpus para la Orangután Sandra. Comentario a propósito de la Sentencia de la Cámara Federal de Casación Penal de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, de 18 de diciembre de 2014
par: Gustavo Federico de Baggis
Publié: (2015) -
Arthur bear’s dilemma
par: Gustavo Federico de Baggis
Publié: (2016) -
Effectiveness of habeas corpus to free a chimpanzee (Cecilia). Commentary on the Judgment of November 3, 2016 Third Trial Court of the State of Mendoza (Argentina)
par: Francisco Capacete González
Publié: (2016) -
Jeremy Bentham, a pioneer
par: Oriol Caudevilla
Publié: (2013) -
Crónica Animal Law and Ethics Conference, Zurich 2012
par: Carlos Andrés Contreras López
Publié: (2012)