FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.

<h4>Background</h4>While traditionally quite distinct, functional neuroimaging (e.g. functional magnetic resonance imaging: fMRI) and functional interference techniques (e.g. transcranial magnetic stimulation: TMS) increasingly address similar questions of functional brain organization,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tom A de Graaf, Christianne Jacobs, Alard Roebroeck, Alexander T Sack
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f61741c31afa480f99c24c0797beac13
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f61741c31afa480f99c24c0797beac13
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f61741c31afa480f99c24c0797beac132021-11-25T06:27:26ZFMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0008307https://doaj.org/article/f61741c31afa480f99c24c0797beac132009-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20011541/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>While traditionally quite distinct, functional neuroimaging (e.g. functional magnetic resonance imaging: fMRI) and functional interference techniques (e.g. transcranial magnetic stimulation: TMS) increasingly address similar questions of functional brain organization, including connectivity, interactions, and causality in the brain. Time-resolved TMS over multiple brain network nodes can elucidate the relative timings of functional relevance for behavior ("TMS chronometry"), while fMRI functional or effective connectivity (fMRI EC) can map task-specific interactions between brain regions based on the interrelation of measured signals. The current study empirically assessed the relation between these different methods.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>One group of 15 participants took part in two experiments: one fMRI EC study, and one TMS chronometry study, both of which used an established cognitive paradigm involving one visuospatial judgment task and one color judgment control task. Granger causality mapping (GCM), a data-driven variant of fMRI EC analysis, revealed a frontal-to-parietal flow of information, from inferior/middle frontal gyrus (MFG) to posterior parietal cortex (PPC). FMRI EC-guided Neuronavigated TMS had behavioral effects when applied to both PPC and to MFG, but the temporal pattern of these effects was similar for both stimulation sites. At first glance, this would seem in contradiction to the fMRI EC results. However, we discuss how TMS chronometry and fMRI EC are conceptually different and show how they can be complementary and mutually constraining, rather than contradictory, on the basis of our data.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>The findings that fMRI EC could successfully localize functionally relevant TMS target regions on the single subject level, and conversely, that TMS confirmed an fMRI EC identified functional network to be behaviorally relevant, have important methodological and theoretical implications. Our results, in combination with data from earlier studies by our group (Sack et al., 2007, Cerebral Cortex), lead to informed speculations on complex brain mechanisms, and TMS disruption thereof, underlying visuospatial judgment. This first in-depth empirical and conceptual comparison of fMRI EC and TMS chronometry thereby shows the complementary insights offered by the two methods.Tom A de GraafChristianne JacobsAlard RoebroeckAlexander T SackPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 4, Iss 12, p e8307 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Tom A de Graaf
Christianne Jacobs
Alard Roebroeck
Alexander T Sack
FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.
description <h4>Background</h4>While traditionally quite distinct, functional neuroimaging (e.g. functional magnetic resonance imaging: fMRI) and functional interference techniques (e.g. transcranial magnetic stimulation: TMS) increasingly address similar questions of functional brain organization, including connectivity, interactions, and causality in the brain. Time-resolved TMS over multiple brain network nodes can elucidate the relative timings of functional relevance for behavior ("TMS chronometry"), while fMRI functional or effective connectivity (fMRI EC) can map task-specific interactions between brain regions based on the interrelation of measured signals. The current study empirically assessed the relation between these different methods.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>One group of 15 participants took part in two experiments: one fMRI EC study, and one TMS chronometry study, both of which used an established cognitive paradigm involving one visuospatial judgment task and one color judgment control task. Granger causality mapping (GCM), a data-driven variant of fMRI EC analysis, revealed a frontal-to-parietal flow of information, from inferior/middle frontal gyrus (MFG) to posterior parietal cortex (PPC). FMRI EC-guided Neuronavigated TMS had behavioral effects when applied to both PPC and to MFG, but the temporal pattern of these effects was similar for both stimulation sites. At first glance, this would seem in contradiction to the fMRI EC results. However, we discuss how TMS chronometry and fMRI EC are conceptually different and show how they can be complementary and mutually constraining, rather than contradictory, on the basis of our data.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>The findings that fMRI EC could successfully localize functionally relevant TMS target regions on the single subject level, and conversely, that TMS confirmed an fMRI EC identified functional network to be behaviorally relevant, have important methodological and theoretical implications. Our results, in combination with data from earlier studies by our group (Sack et al., 2007, Cerebral Cortex), lead to informed speculations on complex brain mechanisms, and TMS disruption thereof, underlying visuospatial judgment. This first in-depth empirical and conceptual comparison of fMRI EC and TMS chronometry thereby shows the complementary insights offered by the two methods.
format article
author Tom A de Graaf
Christianne Jacobs
Alard Roebroeck
Alexander T Sack
author_facet Tom A de Graaf
Christianne Jacobs
Alard Roebroeck
Alexander T Sack
author_sort Tom A de Graaf
title FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.
title_short FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.
title_full FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.
title_fullStr FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.
title_full_unstemmed FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.
title_sort fmri effective connectivity and tms chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/f61741c31afa480f99c24c0797beac13
work_keys_str_mv AT tomadegraaf fmrieffectiveconnectivityandtmschronometrycomplementaryaccountsofcausalityinthevisuospatialjudgmentnetwork
AT christiannejacobs fmrieffectiveconnectivityandtmschronometrycomplementaryaccountsofcausalityinthevisuospatialjudgmentnetwork
AT alardroebroeck fmrieffectiveconnectivityandtmschronometrycomplementaryaccountsofcausalityinthevisuospatialjudgmentnetwork
AT alexandertsack fmrieffectiveconnectivityandtmschronometrycomplementaryaccountsofcausalityinthevisuospatialjudgmentnetwork
_version_ 1718413718193176576