COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Objective: To compare the acceptability of insertion of post placental intra uterine contraceptive device, with respect to gravidity between vaginal deliveries and caesarean sections. Study Design: Prospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Frontier Corp Hospital, Quetta, fro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Saira Tasneem, Sanum Kashif, Erum Pervaiz, Faisal Azam
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2020
Materias:	caesarean section intrauterine contraceptive device normal vaginal delivery long acting reversible contraceptive Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v70i6.3988 https://doaj.org/article/f617ba36b01049858478f7ea873b120d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f617ba36b01049858478f7ea873b120d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f617ba36b01049858478f7ea873b120d2021-12-02T17:16:15ZCOMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALhttps://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v70i6.39880030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/f617ba36b01049858478f7ea873b120d2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3988https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: To compare the acceptability of insertion of post placental intra uterine contraceptive device, with respect to gravidity between vaginal deliveries and caesarean sections. Study Design: Prospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Frontier Corp Hospital, Quetta, from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020. Methodology: A total of 399 females with age of 18 to 45 years with gravidity (primi, multi and grand multi gravida) were counselled during antenatal visits about benefits and risks of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) insertion. For complications, females were assessed at 1 and 6 weeks after delivery. Results: A total of 399 females with mean age 27.95 ± 5.07 years were included in study. About 235 (55.9%) women delivered vaginally and 164 (41.4%) women by caesarean section. Acceptance rate was 3.8% and 4.3% for vaginal and caesarean deliveries respectively. Eleven (73.3%) women were grand multi gravida and 4 women (26.6%) were multi gravid in vaginal delivery acceptance group versus 8 women (47%) grand multi and 9 women (52.9%) multi gravida in caesarean acceptance group. Five (15%) females presented with complications (3 with abdominal pain and 1 each with infection and expulsion). Conclusion: The overall acceptance rate of PPIUCD was low in this study, the acceptance rate was higher in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery (NVD) as compared to lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), similarly more of the grand multiparas accepted the method as compared to other participants however the differences were not statistically significant.Saira TasneemSanum KashifErum PervaizFaisal AzamArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticlecaesarean sectionintrauterine contraceptive devicenormal vaginal deliverylong acting reversible contraceptiveMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 70, Iss 6, Pp 1707-1711 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	caesarean section intrauterine contraceptive device normal vaginal delivery long acting reversible contraceptive Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	caesarean section intrauterine contraceptive device normal vaginal delivery long acting reversible contraceptive Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Saira Tasneem Sanum Kashif Erum Pervaiz Faisal Azam COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
description	Objective: To compare the acceptability of insertion of post placental intra uterine contraceptive device, with respect to gravidity between vaginal deliveries and caesarean sections. Study Design: Prospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Frontier Corp Hospital, Quetta, from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020. Methodology: A total of 399 females with age of 18 to 45 years with gravidity (primi, multi and grand multi gravida) were counselled during antenatal visits about benefits and risks of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) insertion. For complications, females were assessed at 1 and 6 weeks after delivery. Results: A total of 399 females with mean age 27.95 ± 5.07 years were included in study. About 235 (55.9%) women delivered vaginally and 164 (41.4%) women by caesarean section. Acceptance rate was 3.8% and 4.3% for vaginal and caesarean deliveries respectively. Eleven (73.3%) women were grand multi gravida and 4 women (26.6%) were multi gravid in vaginal delivery acceptance group versus 8 women (47%) grand multi and 9 women (52.9%) multi gravida in caesarean acceptance group. Five (15%) females presented with complications (3 with abdominal pain and 1 each with infection and expulsion). Conclusion: The overall acceptance rate of PPIUCD was low in this study, the acceptance rate was higher in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery (NVD) as compared to lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), similarly more of the grand multiparas accepted the method as compared to other participants however the differences were not statistically significant.
format	article
author	Saira Tasneem Sanum Kashif Erum Pervaiz Faisal Azam
author_facet	Saira Tasneem Sanum Kashif Erum Pervaiz Faisal Azam
author_sort	Saira Tasneem
title	COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
title_short	COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
title_full	COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
title_fullStr	COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
title_full_unstemmed	COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
title_sort	comparison of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device insertion between vaginal delivery and caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital
publisher	Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate	2020
url	https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v70i6.3988 https://doaj.org/article/f617ba36b01049858478f7ea873b120d
work_keys_str_mv	AT sairatasneem comparisonofpostplacentalintrauterinecontraceptivedeviceinsertionbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansectioninatertiarycarehospital AT sanumkashif comparisonofpostplacentalintrauterinecontraceptivedeviceinsertionbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansectioninatertiarycarehospital AT erumpervaiz comparisonofpostplacentalintrauterinecontraceptivedeviceinsertionbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansectioninatertiarycarehospital AT faisalazam comparisonofpostplacentalintrauterinecontraceptivedeviceinsertionbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansectioninatertiarycarehospital
_version_	1718381178079150080

COMPARISON OF POST PLACENTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION BETWEEN VAGINAL DELIVERY AND CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Ejemplares similares