The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine

Background. Raabe probe is a suction device with monopolar motor fibers mapping capabilities. A number of technical characteristics make it possible to use it for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.The aim of this study was to analyze our experience o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: N. A. Bobriakov, A. Kh. Dzhumabaev, F. G. Khamidullin, A. M. Tsyrenzhapov, E. V. Sereda, S. I. Petrov, P. A. Belosludtsev, E. A. Angarkhaev, A. Yu. Tarkhov, K. P. Maksimov, A. A. Ponomarev
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f667aded35eb498394b02b1a1569f05b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f667aded35eb498394b02b1a1569f05b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f667aded35eb498394b02b1a1569f05b2021-11-23T06:14:45ZThe Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine2541-94202587-959610.29413/ABS.2021-6.1.11https://doaj.org/article/f667aded35eb498394b02b1a1569f05b2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/2621https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9420https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9596Background. Raabe probe is a suction device with monopolar motor fibers mapping capabilities. A number of technical characteristics make it possible to use it for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.The aim of this study was to analyze our experience of Raabe probe using for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.Methods. Ninety-eight patients (55 women and 43 men) with degenerative changes and injuries of the lumbar spine were included into the study, mean age – 56.3 ± 12.8 years. Patients underwent the following operations: 85 cases (86.7 %) – spinal roots decompression with fusion by dorsal and ventral implants, 12 cases (12.2 %) – decompression with only dorsal fusion, 1 case (1.0 %) – dorsal fusion without decompression. In all cases intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring control by B. Calancie method with Raabe probe using was performed.Results. With a critical current threshold of 12 mA, the sensitivity of the method is 94 %, the specificity is 97 %. Comparing the thresholds of the M-response at the stage of screw stimulation, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups of true-positive and false-positive results, both for interested (p = 0.09) and intact (p = 0,16) screws. At the stage of the impactor stimulation, the threshold of the M-response in the true-positive group made11.39 ± 7.97 mA, and in the false-positive group – 24.16 ± 8.85 mA (p < 0.05).Conclusion. Raabe probe application for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery show the high sensitivity and specificity. The most reliable sign of pedicle wall breach is a threshold below than 12 mA at the stage of the impactor stimulation.N. A. BobriakovA. Kh. DzhumabaevF. G. KhamidullinA. M. TsyrenzhapovE. V. SeredaS. I. PetrovP. A. BelosludtsevE. A. AngarkhaevA. Yu. TarkhovK. P. MaksimovA. A. PonomarevScientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problemsarticleintraoperative neurophysiologic monitoringpedicle screwelectromyographythresholdScienceQRUActa Biomedica Scientifica, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 81-87 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring
pedicle screw
electromyography
threshold
Science
Q
spellingShingle intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring
pedicle screw
electromyography
threshold
Science
Q
N. A. Bobriakov
A. Kh. Dzhumabaev
F. G. Khamidullin
A. M. Tsyrenzhapov
E. V. Sereda
S. I. Petrov
P. A. Belosludtsev
E. A. Angarkhaev
A. Yu. Tarkhov
K. P. Maksimov
A. A. Ponomarev
The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine
description Background. Raabe probe is a suction device with monopolar motor fibers mapping capabilities. A number of technical characteristics make it possible to use it for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.The aim of this study was to analyze our experience of Raabe probe using for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.Methods. Ninety-eight patients (55 women and 43 men) with degenerative changes and injuries of the lumbar spine were included into the study, mean age – 56.3 ± 12.8 years. Patients underwent the following operations: 85 cases (86.7 %) – spinal roots decompression with fusion by dorsal and ventral implants, 12 cases (12.2 %) – decompression with only dorsal fusion, 1 case (1.0 %) – dorsal fusion without decompression. In all cases intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring control by B. Calancie method with Raabe probe using was performed.Results. With a critical current threshold of 12 mA, the sensitivity of the method is 94 %, the specificity is 97 %. Comparing the thresholds of the M-response at the stage of screw stimulation, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups of true-positive and false-positive results, both for interested (p = 0.09) and intact (p = 0,16) screws. At the stage of the impactor stimulation, the threshold of the M-response in the true-positive group made11.39 ± 7.97 mA, and in the false-positive group – 24.16 ± 8.85 mA (p < 0.05).Conclusion. Raabe probe application for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery show the high sensitivity and specificity. The most reliable sign of pedicle wall breach is a threshold below than 12 mA at the stage of the impactor stimulation.
format article
author N. A. Bobriakov
A. Kh. Dzhumabaev
F. G. Khamidullin
A. M. Tsyrenzhapov
E. V. Sereda
S. I. Petrov
P. A. Belosludtsev
E. A. Angarkhaev
A. Yu. Tarkhov
K. P. Maksimov
A. A. Ponomarev
author_facet N. A. Bobriakov
A. Kh. Dzhumabaev
F. G. Khamidullin
A. M. Tsyrenzhapov
E. V. Sereda
S. I. Petrov
P. A. Belosludtsev
E. A. Angarkhaev
A. Yu. Tarkhov
K. P. Maksimov
A. A. Ponomarev
author_sort N. A. Bobriakov
title The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine
title_short The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine
title_full The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine
title_fullStr The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine
title_full_unstemmed The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine
title_sort use of the raabe aspirator in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during decompression and stabilization interventions for degenerative diseases and injuries of the lumbar spine
publisher Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f667aded35eb498394b02b1a1569f05b
work_keys_str_mv AT nabobriakov theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT akhdzhumabaev theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT fgkhamidullin theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT amtsyrenzhapov theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT evsereda theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT sipetrov theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT pabelosludtsev theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT eaangarkhaev theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT ayutarkhov theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT kpmaksimov theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT aaponomarev theuseoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT nabobriakov useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT akhdzhumabaev useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT fgkhamidullin useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT amtsyrenzhapov useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT evsereda useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT sipetrov useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT pabelosludtsev useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT eaangarkhaev useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT ayutarkhov useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT kpmaksimov useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
AT aaponomarev useoftheraabeaspiratorinintraoperativeneurophysiologicalmonitoringduringdecompressionandstabilizationinterventionsfordegenerativediseasesandinjuriesofthelumbarspine
_version_ 1718416921123094528