Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology

Background. Heart rhythm disorders, especially atrial fibrillation (AF), are increasing global health challenges. Conventional diagnostic tools for assessment of rhythm disorders suffer from limited availability, limited test duration time, and usability challenges. There is also a need for out-of-h...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edvard Liljedahl Sandberg, Bjørnar Leangen Grenne, Trygve Berge, Jostein Grimsmo, Dan Atar, Sigrun Halvorsen, Rune Fensli, Jarle Jortveit
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f6a1c8aaafd9461bac109b262ee8de05
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f6a1c8aaafd9461bac109b262ee8de05
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f6a1c8aaafd9461bac109b262ee8de052021-11-15T01:20:04ZDiagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology2040-230910.1155/2021/5230947https://doaj.org/article/f6a1c8aaafd9461bac109b262ee8de052021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5230947https://doaj.org/toc/2040-2309Background. Heart rhythm disorders, especially atrial fibrillation (AF), are increasing global health challenges. Conventional diagnostic tools for assessment of rhythm disorders suffer from limited availability, limited test duration time, and usability challenges. There is also a need for out-of-hospital investigation of arrhythmias. Therefore, the Norwegian ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor has been developed to simplify the assessment of heart rhythm disorders. The current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor compared to conventional Holter monitors. Methods. Parallel tests with ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor and a Holter monitor were performed in 151 consecutive patients referred for out-of-hospital long-term ECG recording at Sorlandet Hospital Arendal, Norway. All ECG data were automatically analysed by both systems and evaluated by hospital physicians. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire scoring usability parameters after the test. Results. A total of 150 patients (62% men, age 54 (±17) years) completed the study. The ECG quality from both monitors was considered satisfactory for rhythm analysis in all patients. AF was identified in 9 (6%) patients during the period with parallel tests. The diagnostic accuracy for automatic AF detection was 95% (95% CI 91–98) for the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor and 81% (95% CI 74–87) for the Holter system. The proportion of false-positive AF was 4% in tests analysed by the ECG247 algorithm and 16% in tests analysed by the Holter algorithm. Other arrhythmias were absent/rare. The system usability score was significantly better for ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor compared to traditional Holter technology (score 87.4 vs. 67.5, p<0.001). Conclusions. The ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor showed at least comparable diagnostic accuracy for AF and improved usability compared to conventional Holter technology. ECG247 allows for prolonged monitoring and may improve detection of AF. This trial is registered with https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04700865.Edvard Liljedahl SandbergBjørnar Leangen GrenneTrygve BergeJostein GrimsmoDan AtarSigrun HalvorsenRune FensliJarle JortveitHindawi LimitedarticleMedicine (General)R5-920Medical technologyR855-855.5ENJournal of Healthcare Engineering, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Edvard Liljedahl Sandberg
Bjørnar Leangen Grenne
Trygve Berge
Jostein Grimsmo
Dan Atar
Sigrun Halvorsen
Rune Fensli
Jarle Jortveit
Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology
description Background. Heart rhythm disorders, especially atrial fibrillation (AF), are increasing global health challenges. Conventional diagnostic tools for assessment of rhythm disorders suffer from limited availability, limited test duration time, and usability challenges. There is also a need for out-of-hospital investigation of arrhythmias. Therefore, the Norwegian ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor has been developed to simplify the assessment of heart rhythm disorders. The current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor compared to conventional Holter monitors. Methods. Parallel tests with ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor and a Holter monitor were performed in 151 consecutive patients referred for out-of-hospital long-term ECG recording at Sorlandet Hospital Arendal, Norway. All ECG data were automatically analysed by both systems and evaluated by hospital physicians. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire scoring usability parameters after the test. Results. A total of 150 patients (62% men, age 54 (±17) years) completed the study. The ECG quality from both monitors was considered satisfactory for rhythm analysis in all patients. AF was identified in 9 (6%) patients during the period with parallel tests. The diagnostic accuracy for automatic AF detection was 95% (95% CI 91–98) for the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor and 81% (95% CI 74–87) for the Holter system. The proportion of false-positive AF was 4% in tests analysed by the ECG247 algorithm and 16% in tests analysed by the Holter algorithm. Other arrhythmias were absent/rare. The system usability score was significantly better for ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor compared to traditional Holter technology (score 87.4 vs. 67.5, p<0.001). Conclusions. The ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor showed at least comparable diagnostic accuracy for AF and improved usability compared to conventional Holter technology. ECG247 allows for prolonged monitoring and may improve detection of AF. This trial is registered with https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04700865.
format article
author Edvard Liljedahl Sandberg
Bjørnar Leangen Grenne
Trygve Berge
Jostein Grimsmo
Dan Atar
Sigrun Halvorsen
Rune Fensli
Jarle Jortveit
author_facet Edvard Liljedahl Sandberg
Bjørnar Leangen Grenne
Trygve Berge
Jostein Grimsmo
Dan Atar
Sigrun Halvorsen
Rune Fensli
Jarle Jortveit
author_sort Edvard Liljedahl Sandberg
title Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy and Usability of the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor Compared to Conventional Holter Technology
title_sort diagnostic accuracy and usability of the ecg247 smart heart sensor compared to conventional holter technology
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f6a1c8aaafd9461bac109b262ee8de05
work_keys_str_mv AT edvardliljedahlsandberg diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
AT bjørnarleangengrenne diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
AT trygveberge diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
AT josteingrimsmo diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
AT danatar diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
AT sigrunhalvorsen diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
AT runefensli diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
AT jarlejortveit diagnosticaccuracyandusabilityoftheecg247smartheartsensorcomparedtoconventionalholtertechnology
_version_ 1718428960566542336