Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources
Abstract Psychological resilience is indicated when individuals demonstrate good mental health despite exposure to significant stress or adversity. Good mental health may involve low levels of illbeing and/or high levels of wellbeing. There is still very limited knowledge about the potential differe...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f6b538ed4769490daa248377e63767a1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f6b538ed4769490daa248377e63767a1 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f6b538ed4769490daa248377e63767a12021-12-02T18:27:49ZIntroducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources10.1038/s41598-021-87581-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f6b538ed4769490daa248377e63767a12021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87581-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Psychological resilience is indicated when individuals demonstrate good mental health despite exposure to significant stress or adversity. Good mental health may involve low levels of illbeing and/or high levels of wellbeing. There is still very limited knowledge about the potential differences between these outcomes in relation to stressors. We propose a distinction between type 1 and type 2 resilience, examine their underlying genetic and environmental architecture, and identify modifiable resilience factors. The data come from a population-based twin sample (N = 1987, mean age = 63) in the Norwegian Twin Registry. Type 1 and type 2 resilience are operationalised as the residual of anxiety/depression symptoms and life satisfaction, respectively, after lifetime cumulative adversity has been regressed out. We used biometric modelling and cotwin-control linear mixed models to estimate underlying factors and identify predictors while controlling for genetic confounding. The results support the notion of two separate, but partly overlapping types of resilience. We find heritabilities of 0.30 (type 1) and 0.24 (type 2) and a genetic correlation of 0.43. Potentially causal resilience factors include, but are not limited to, meaning in life, physical activity, positive affect and relationship satisfaction. Whereas some factors are associated with both resilience types, other factors are unique to each type.Live Skow HofgaardRagnhild Bang NesEspen RøysambNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Live Skow Hofgaard Ragnhild Bang Nes Espen Røysamb Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources |
description |
Abstract Psychological resilience is indicated when individuals demonstrate good mental health despite exposure to significant stress or adversity. Good mental health may involve low levels of illbeing and/or high levels of wellbeing. There is still very limited knowledge about the potential differences between these outcomes in relation to stressors. We propose a distinction between type 1 and type 2 resilience, examine their underlying genetic and environmental architecture, and identify modifiable resilience factors. The data come from a population-based twin sample (N = 1987, mean age = 63) in the Norwegian Twin Registry. Type 1 and type 2 resilience are operationalised as the residual of anxiety/depression symptoms and life satisfaction, respectively, after lifetime cumulative adversity has been regressed out. We used biometric modelling and cotwin-control linear mixed models to estimate underlying factors and identify predictors while controlling for genetic confounding. The results support the notion of two separate, but partly overlapping types of resilience. We find heritabilities of 0.30 (type 1) and 0.24 (type 2) and a genetic correlation of 0.43. Potentially causal resilience factors include, but are not limited to, meaning in life, physical activity, positive affect and relationship satisfaction. Whereas some factors are associated with both resilience types, other factors are unique to each type. |
format |
article |
author |
Live Skow Hofgaard Ragnhild Bang Nes Espen Røysamb |
author_facet |
Live Skow Hofgaard Ragnhild Bang Nes Espen Røysamb |
author_sort |
Live Skow Hofgaard |
title |
Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources |
title_short |
Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources |
title_full |
Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources |
title_fullStr |
Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources |
title_full_unstemmed |
Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources |
title_sort |
introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f6b538ed4769490daa248377e63767a1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liveskowhofgaard introducingtwotypesofpsychologicalresiliencewithpartlyuniquegeneticandenvironmentalsources AT ragnhildbangnes introducingtwotypesofpsychologicalresiliencewithpartlyuniquegeneticandenvironmentalsources AT espenrøysamb introducingtwotypesofpsychologicalresiliencewithpartlyuniquegeneticandenvironmentalsources |
_version_ |
1718378016540721152 |