To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations

This article addresses the issue of legitimizing some types of activities of states countering the terrorist threat originating from the territory of other states. In different documents equivalent actions are defined by diverse terms (political assassination, targeted liquidation, targeted eliminat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 2018
Materias:	use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism armed conflict interna tional humanitarian law targeted killing legitimacy interpretation Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f702bf13a4274ee8b42c43be80d8ad12
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f702bf13a4274ee8b42c43be80d8ad12
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f702bf13a4274ee8b42c43be80d8ad122021-11-12T10:45:58ZTo the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations1726-11391816-859010.22394/1726-1139-2017-7-25-36https://doaj.org/article/f702bf13a4274ee8b42c43be80d8ad122018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/613https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590This article addresses the issue of legitimizing some types of activities of states countering the terrorist threat originating from the territory of other states. In different documents equivalent actions are defined by diverse terms (political assassination, targeted liquidation, targeted elimination, execution without due process, extrajudicial execution), which creates significant difficulties in the process of coordinating the willpower of states in pursue of their national security objectives. In a number of cases, it is possible to eliminate the terminological inconsistency by determining the actions carried out by the armed forces in terms of international humanitarian law. In this case, some actions of the armed forces formations within the territory of failed states aimed at the elimination of key terrorist figures to be defined as «targeted killing». This solution facilitates the task of assigning of international responsibility.Stanislav Valentinovich KorostelevNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration articleuse of forcepolitical and legal justificationcountering terrorismarmed conflictinterna tional humanitarian lawtargeted killinglegitimacyinterpretationPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENRUУправленческое консультирование, Vol 0, Iss 7, Pp 25-36 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism armed conflict interna tional humanitarian law targeted killing legitimacy interpretation Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
spellingShingle	use of force political and legal justification countering terrorism armed conflict interna tional humanitarian law targeted killing legitimacy interpretation Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations
description	This article addresses the issue of legitimizing some types of activities of states countering the terrorist threat originating from the territory of other states. In different documents equivalent actions are defined by diverse terms (political assassination, targeted liquidation, targeted elimination, execution without due process, extrajudicial execution), which creates significant difficulties in the process of coordinating the willpower of states in pursue of their national security objectives. In a number of cases, it is possible to eliminate the terminological inconsistency by determining the actions carried out by the armed forces in terms of international humanitarian law. In this case, some actions of the armed forces formations within the territory of failed states aimed at the elimination of key terrorist figures to be defined as «targeted killing». This solution facilitates the task of assigning of international responsibility.
format	article
author	Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
author_facet	Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
author_sort	Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
title	To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations
title_short	To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations
title_full	To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations
title_fullStr	To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations
title_full_unstemmed	To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations
title_sort	to the issue of nonconcurrence of definitions in a context of legitimization of counterterrorism operations
publisher	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/f702bf13a4274ee8b42c43be80d8ad12
work_keys_str_mv	AT stanislavvalentinovichkorostelev totheissueofnonconcurrenceofdefinitionsinacontextoflegitimizationofcounterterrorismoperations
_version_	1718430967443488768

To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations

Ejemplares similares