Losing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?

In this article, I argue that what is commonly lamented as the decline of qualitative research might be because of our own inability to reveal something true about being-in-the-world. Four problems with qualitative work are identified: making what is obvious inescapable, confusion around what const...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: James Colin Field
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University of Calgary 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f716cbb85e074a6a85f246632e528dbd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f716cbb85e074a6a85f246632e528dbd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f716cbb85e074a6a85f246632e528dbd2021-11-25T21:24:48ZLosing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?10.11575/jah.v0i0.533081927-4416https://doaj.org/article/f716cbb85e074a6a85f246632e528dbd2017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/53308https://doaj.org/toc/1927-4416 In this article, I argue that what is commonly lamented as the decline of qualitative research might be because of our own inability to reveal something true about being-in-the-world. Four problems with qualitative work are identified: making what is obvious inescapable, confusion around what constitutes qualitative research and phenomenology, uniformed and disrespectful mixing of methods, and devolution into “little t” truth. I finish by calling for bold, evocative interpretation, and posing the question: What is the nature of the revolution that hermeneutics can foment?  James Colin FieldUniversity of CalgaryarticleQualitative researchhermeneuticsphenomenology mixed methodsbricoleurmultiple realtiestruthPhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENJournal of Applied Hermeneutics (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Qualitative research
hermeneutics
phenomenology mixed methods
bricoleur
multiple realties
truth
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle Qualitative research
hermeneutics
phenomenology mixed methods
bricoleur
multiple realties
truth
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
James Colin Field
Losing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?
description In this article, I argue that what is commonly lamented as the decline of qualitative research might be because of our own inability to reveal something true about being-in-the-world. Four problems with qualitative work are identified: making what is obvious inescapable, confusion around what constitutes qualitative research and phenomenology, uniformed and disrespectful mixing of methods, and devolution into “little t” truth. I finish by calling for bold, evocative interpretation, and posing the question: What is the nature of the revolution that hermeneutics can foment? 
format article
author James Colin Field
author_facet James Colin Field
author_sort James Colin Field
title Losing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?
title_short Losing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?
title_full Losing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?
title_fullStr Losing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?
title_full_unstemmed Losing the So-Called Paradigm War: Does our Confusion, Disarray, and Retreat Contribute to the Advance?
title_sort losing the so-called paradigm war: does our confusion, disarray, and retreat contribute to the advance?
publisher University of Calgary
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/f716cbb85e074a6a85f246632e528dbd
work_keys_str_mv AT jamescolinfield losingthesocalledparadigmwardoesourconfusiondisarrayandretreatcontributetotheadvance
_version_ 1718410068691517440