Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis

Population studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have revealed no relationship between iron status and breast cancer, a weak positive association, or a small protective effect of low iron status. However, in those studies, the authors concluded that further investigation was merited. The se...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry J. Thompson, Elizabeth S. Neil, John N. McGinley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f764a0cad5564b20b8c3ce54779732e1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f764a0cad5564b20b8c3ce54779732e1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f764a0cad5564b20b8c3ce54779732e12021-11-25T16:50:12ZPre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis10.3390/biomedicines91116522227-9059https://doaj.org/article/f764a0cad5564b20b8c3ce54779732e12021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/9/11/1652https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9059Population studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have revealed no relationship between iron status and breast cancer, a weak positive association, or a small protective effect of low iron status. However, in those studies, the authors concluded that further investigation was merited. The set of experiments reported here used preclinical models to assess the likely value of further investigation. The effects of iron status on the initiation and promotion stage of mammary carcinogenesis are reported. Using the classical model of cancer initiation in the mammary gland, 7,12 dimethyl-benz[α]anthracene-induced carcinogenesis was unaffected by iron status. Similarly, excess iron intake showed no effect on the promotion stage of 1-methyl-1-nitrosurea-induced mammary carcinogenesis, though iron deficiency exerted a specific inhibitory effect on the carcinogenic process. Though iron-mediated cellular oxidation is frequently cited as a potential mechanism for effects on breast cancer, no evidence of increased oxidative damage to DNA attributable to excess iron intake was found. The reported preclinical data fail to provide convincing evidence that the further evaluation of the iron–breast cancer risk hypotheses is warranted and underscore the value of redefining the referent group in population-based studies of iron–cancer hypotheses in other tissues.Henry J. ThompsonElizabeth S. NeilJohn N. McGinleyMDPI AGarticleironbreast canceroxidative damageBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENBiomedicines, Vol 9, Iss 1652, p 1652 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic iron
breast cancer
oxidative damage
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle iron
breast cancer
oxidative damage
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Henry J. Thompson
Elizabeth S. Neil
John N. McGinley
Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis
description Population studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have revealed no relationship between iron status and breast cancer, a weak positive association, or a small protective effect of low iron status. However, in those studies, the authors concluded that further investigation was merited. The set of experiments reported here used preclinical models to assess the likely value of further investigation. The effects of iron status on the initiation and promotion stage of mammary carcinogenesis are reported. Using the classical model of cancer initiation in the mammary gland, 7,12 dimethyl-benz[α]anthracene-induced carcinogenesis was unaffected by iron status. Similarly, excess iron intake showed no effect on the promotion stage of 1-methyl-1-nitrosurea-induced mammary carcinogenesis, though iron deficiency exerted a specific inhibitory effect on the carcinogenic process. Though iron-mediated cellular oxidation is frequently cited as a potential mechanism for effects on breast cancer, no evidence of increased oxidative damage to DNA attributable to excess iron intake was found. The reported preclinical data fail to provide convincing evidence that the further evaluation of the iron–breast cancer risk hypotheses is warranted and underscore the value of redefining the referent group in population-based studies of iron–cancer hypotheses in other tissues.
format article
author Henry J. Thompson
Elizabeth S. Neil
John N. McGinley
author_facet Henry J. Thompson
Elizabeth S. Neil
John N. McGinley
author_sort Henry J. Thompson
title Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis
title_short Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis
title_full Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis
title_fullStr Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis
title_sort pre-clinical insights into the iron and breast cancer hypothesis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f764a0cad5564b20b8c3ce54779732e1
work_keys_str_mv AT henryjthompson preclinicalinsightsintotheironandbreastcancerhypothesis
AT elizabethsneil preclinicalinsightsintotheironandbreastcancerhypothesis
AT johnnmcginley preclinicalinsightsintotheironandbreastcancerhypothesis
_version_ 1718412934046023680