Toward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome

Abstract The biogeographic diversity of the microbiome can be investigated from two perspectives: the spatiotemporal distribution of species (or any operational taxonomic unit) diversity and the spatiotemporal distribution of metagenomic gene diversity. Together, these provide a complementary unders...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhanshan (Sam) Ma, Aaron M. Ellison
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f7b23577253f44238331db2ee24376f3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f7b23577253f44238331db2ee24376f3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f7b23577253f44238331db2ee24376f32021-11-29T07:06:42ZToward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome2150-892510.1002/ecs2.3807https://doaj.org/article/f7b23577253f44238331db2ee24376f32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3807https://doaj.org/toc/2150-8925Abstract The biogeographic diversity of the microbiome can be investigated from two perspectives: the spatiotemporal distribution of species (or any operational taxonomic unit) diversity and the spatiotemporal distribution of metagenomic gene diversity. Together, these provide a complementary understanding of taxonomic, ecological, evolutionary, and functional aspects of the microbiome. Here, we reformulate the species diversity–area relationship (DAR) to quantify and illustrate metagenomic diversity–area relationships (m‐DAR) with the gut metagenome from the human microbiome project (HMP). Using the m‐DAR, the estimated ranges of human gut metagenomic genes (MG) within and among individuals are 5.0–9.7 × 105 and 4.3–6.9 × 106, respectively; the among‐individual standard errors of these estimates (6.0–7.5 × 105) are of the same order of magnitude as the within‐individual ranges, suggesting high between‐individual variability. We similarly estimated the number of metagenome functional gene clusters (MFCG) to be 222–245 (SE = 1–2). More detailed analysis of the m‐DAR profile, pair‐wise diversity overlap (PDO), maximal accrual diversity (MAD), and ratio of individual‐ to population‐level diversity (RIP) of microbiomes of individuals with healthy guts and those with three microbiome‐associated diseases (obesity, diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disease) identified differences in m‐DAR parameters between healthy and diseased individuals. Methodologically, the m‐DAR and its associated parameters offer a unified toolset with which to study and analyze microbiomes from both species and metagenomic perspectives and to explore spatial scaling of metagenomic diversity within and among individuals. To the best of our knowledge, our illustration of m‐DAR with the human gut metagenome is the first statistically‐based estimate of the richness of human metagenomic genes at population scale.Zhanshan (Sam) MaAaron M. EllisonWileyarticlediversity–area relationshipmetagenome biogeographymetagenome diversity–area relationshipmetagenome functional gene clustermetagenomic genespecies–area relationshipEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosphere, Vol 12, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic diversity–area relationship
metagenome biogeography
metagenome diversity–area relationship
metagenome functional gene cluster
metagenomic gene
species–area relationship
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle diversity–area relationship
metagenome biogeography
metagenome diversity–area relationship
metagenome functional gene cluster
metagenomic gene
species–area relationship
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Zhanshan (Sam) Ma
Aaron M. Ellison
Toward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome
description Abstract The biogeographic diversity of the microbiome can be investigated from two perspectives: the spatiotemporal distribution of species (or any operational taxonomic unit) diversity and the spatiotemporal distribution of metagenomic gene diversity. Together, these provide a complementary understanding of taxonomic, ecological, evolutionary, and functional aspects of the microbiome. Here, we reformulate the species diversity–area relationship (DAR) to quantify and illustrate metagenomic diversity–area relationships (m‐DAR) with the gut metagenome from the human microbiome project (HMP). Using the m‐DAR, the estimated ranges of human gut metagenomic genes (MG) within and among individuals are 5.0–9.7 × 105 and 4.3–6.9 × 106, respectively; the among‐individual standard errors of these estimates (6.0–7.5 × 105) are of the same order of magnitude as the within‐individual ranges, suggesting high between‐individual variability. We similarly estimated the number of metagenome functional gene clusters (MFCG) to be 222–245 (SE = 1–2). More detailed analysis of the m‐DAR profile, pair‐wise diversity overlap (PDO), maximal accrual diversity (MAD), and ratio of individual‐ to population‐level diversity (RIP) of microbiomes of individuals with healthy guts and those with three microbiome‐associated diseases (obesity, diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disease) identified differences in m‐DAR parameters between healthy and diseased individuals. Methodologically, the m‐DAR and its associated parameters offer a unified toolset with which to study and analyze microbiomes from both species and metagenomic perspectives and to explore spatial scaling of metagenomic diversity within and among individuals. To the best of our knowledge, our illustration of m‐DAR with the human gut metagenome is the first statistically‐based estimate of the richness of human metagenomic genes at population scale.
format article
author Zhanshan (Sam) Ma
Aaron M. Ellison
author_facet Zhanshan (Sam) Ma
Aaron M. Ellison
author_sort Zhanshan (Sam) Ma
title Toward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome
title_short Toward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome
title_full Toward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome
title_fullStr Toward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome
title_full_unstemmed Toward a unified diversity–area relationship (DAR) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome
title_sort toward a unified diversity–area relationship (dar) of species and gene diversity illustrated with the human gut metagenome
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f7b23577253f44238331db2ee24376f3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanshansamma towardaunifieddiversityarearelationshipdarofspeciesandgenediversityillustratedwiththehumangutmetagenome
AT aaronmellison towardaunifieddiversityarearelationshipdarofspeciesandgenediversityillustratedwiththehumangutmetagenome
_version_ 1718407562285547520