A new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence

Abstract Cardiovascular and respiratory systems are anatomically and functionally linked; inspiration produces negative intrathoracic pressures that act on the heart and alter cardiac function. Inspiratory pressures increase with heart failure and can exceed the magnitude of ventricular pressure dur...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leslie M. Ogilvie, Brittany A. Edgett, Simon Gray, Sally Al-Mufty, Jason S. Huber, Keith R. Brunt, Jeremy A. Simpson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f81faecfe49a4d2abbd96c1e0fd01c05
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f81faecfe49a4d2abbd96c1e0fd01c05
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f81faecfe49a4d2abbd96c1e0fd01c052021-12-02T15:09:23ZA new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence10.1038/s41598-021-96050-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f81faecfe49a4d2abbd96c1e0fd01c052021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96050-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Cardiovascular and respiratory systems are anatomically and functionally linked; inspiration produces negative intrathoracic pressures that act on the heart and alter cardiac function. Inspiratory pressures increase with heart failure and can exceed the magnitude of ventricular pressure during diastole. Accordingly, respiratory pressures may be a confounding factor to assessing cardiac function. While the interaction between respiration and the heart is well characterized, the extent to which systolic and diastolic indices are affected by inspiration is unknown. Our objective was to understand how inspiratory pressure affects the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function. To do this, we developed custom software to assess and separate indices of systolic and diastolic function into inspiratory, early expiratory, and late expiratory phases of respiration. We then compared cardiac parameters during normal breathing and with various respiratory loads. Variations in inspiratory pressure had a small impact on systolic pressure and function. Conversely, diastolic pressure strongly correlated with negative inspiratory pressure. Cardiac pressures were less affected by respiration during expiration; late expiration was the most stable respiratory phase. In conclusion, inspiration is a large confounding influence on diastolic pressure, but minimally affects systolic pressure. Performing cardiac hemodynamic analysis by accounting for respiratory phase yields more accuracy and analytic confidence to the assessment of diastolic function.Leslie M. OgilvieBrittany A. EdgettSimon GraySally Al-MuftyJason S. HuberKeith R. BruntJeremy A. SimpsonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Leslie M. Ogilvie
Brittany A. Edgett
Simon Gray
Sally Al-Mufty
Jason S. Huber
Keith R. Brunt
Jeremy A. Simpson
A new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence
description Abstract Cardiovascular and respiratory systems are anatomically and functionally linked; inspiration produces negative intrathoracic pressures that act on the heart and alter cardiac function. Inspiratory pressures increase with heart failure and can exceed the magnitude of ventricular pressure during diastole. Accordingly, respiratory pressures may be a confounding factor to assessing cardiac function. While the interaction between respiration and the heart is well characterized, the extent to which systolic and diastolic indices are affected by inspiration is unknown. Our objective was to understand how inspiratory pressure affects the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function. To do this, we developed custom software to assess and separate indices of systolic and diastolic function into inspiratory, early expiratory, and late expiratory phases of respiration. We then compared cardiac parameters during normal breathing and with various respiratory loads. Variations in inspiratory pressure had a small impact on systolic pressure and function. Conversely, diastolic pressure strongly correlated with negative inspiratory pressure. Cardiac pressures were less affected by respiration during expiration; late expiration was the most stable respiratory phase. In conclusion, inspiration is a large confounding influence on diastolic pressure, but minimally affects systolic pressure. Performing cardiac hemodynamic analysis by accounting for respiratory phase yields more accuracy and analytic confidence to the assessment of diastolic function.
format article
author Leslie M. Ogilvie
Brittany A. Edgett
Simon Gray
Sally Al-Mufty
Jason S. Huber
Keith R. Brunt
Jeremy A. Simpson
author_facet Leslie M. Ogilvie
Brittany A. Edgett
Simon Gray
Sally Al-Mufty
Jason S. Huber
Keith R. Brunt
Jeremy A. Simpson
author_sort Leslie M. Ogilvie
title A new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence
title_short A new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence
title_full A new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence
title_fullStr A new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence
title_full_unstemmed A new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence
title_sort new approach to improve the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function independent of respiratory influence
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f81faecfe49a4d2abbd96c1e0fd01c05
work_keys_str_mv AT lesliemogilvie anewapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT brittanyaedgett anewapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT simongray anewapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT sallyalmufty anewapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT jasonshuber anewapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT keithrbrunt anewapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT jeremyasimpson anewapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT lesliemogilvie newapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT brittanyaedgett newapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT simongray newapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT sallyalmufty newapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT jasonshuber newapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT keithrbrunt newapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
AT jeremyasimpson newapproachtoimprovethehemodynamicassessmentofcardiacfunctionindependentofrespiratoryinfluence
_version_ 1718387852761366528