The Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential

From a disciplinary angle, horror could be viewed as a more imaginative, illegitimate brother of anthropology, or rather, its more poetic, kindred soul. Much like horror, the anthropological way of thinking is preoccupied by matters of the alien, the otherworldly, the hidden and the marginal. The t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marko Pišev
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f8c9b725afa644bfa42cce25edf02837
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f8c9b725afa644bfa42cce25edf02837
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f8c9b725afa644bfa42cce25edf028372021-12-02T01:23:32ZThe Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/f8c9b725afa644bfa42cce25edf028372016-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.eap-iea.org/novi-ojs/index.php/eap/article/view/667https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801 From a disciplinary angle, horror could be viewed as a more imaginative, illegitimate brother of anthropology, or rather, its more poetic, kindred soul. Much like horror, the anthropological way of thinking is preoccupied by matters of the alien, the otherworldly, the hidden and the marginal. The two angles of viewing people and their world intersect in a number of common issues, starting with questions of the body and embodiment, through the relationship between an individual and the community and the community toward otherness, to the basic questions of people’s spiritual and posthumous lives. Yet, horror as a specific artistic genre has not been researched enough within an anthropological framework, perhaps because it offers artistic and not strictly scientific answers to questions posed by anthropology. In this thematic issue of Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, for the first time in Serbian anthropology an opportunity arose to publish a collection of scientific texts about the horror genre in one place. Authors who generously submitted their papers for this thematic issue have shown that horror stories can be interpreted in a number of ways which demand a degree of interdisciplinarity, but without ever leaving the familiar framework of the anthropological focus. However, the analysis of horror stories is not common within our discipline. Why is this? Marko PiševUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 11, Iss 2 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle Anthropology
GN1-890
Marko Pišev
The Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential
description From a disciplinary angle, horror could be viewed as a more imaginative, illegitimate brother of anthropology, or rather, its more poetic, kindred soul. Much like horror, the anthropological way of thinking is preoccupied by matters of the alien, the otherworldly, the hidden and the marginal. The two angles of viewing people and their world intersect in a number of common issues, starting with questions of the body and embodiment, through the relationship between an individual and the community and the community toward otherness, to the basic questions of people’s spiritual and posthumous lives. Yet, horror as a specific artistic genre has not been researched enough within an anthropological framework, perhaps because it offers artistic and not strictly scientific answers to questions posed by anthropology. In this thematic issue of Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, for the first time in Serbian anthropology an opportunity arose to publish a collection of scientific texts about the horror genre in one place. Authors who generously submitted their papers for this thematic issue have shown that horror stories can be interpreted in a number of ways which demand a degree of interdisciplinarity, but without ever leaving the familiar framework of the anthropological focus. However, the analysis of horror stories is not common within our discipline. Why is this?
format article
author Marko Pišev
author_facet Marko Pišev
author_sort Marko Pišev
title The Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential
title_short The Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential
title_full The Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential
title_fullStr The Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential
title_full_unstemmed The Anthropology of Horror: Theoretical Challenges and Epistemological Potential
title_sort anthropology of horror: theoretical challenges and epistemological potential
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/f8c9b725afa644bfa42cce25edf02837
work_keys_str_mv AT markopisev theanthropologyofhorrortheoreticalchallengesandepistemologicalpotential
AT markopisev anthropologyofhorrortheoreticalchallengesandepistemologicalpotential
_version_ 1718403172838408192