Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation

Abstract An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yanxiu Sun, Maximilian Hammer, Timur M. Yildirim, Ramin Khoramnia, Gerd U. Auffarth
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c2021-11-08T10:52:31ZPupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation10.1038/s41598-021-01051-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01051-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and high-mesopic = 4 lx) for anterior iris-claw IOL fixation for correcting myopia or hyperopia (IFPH), retropupillary iris-claw IOL fixation to correct aphakia or as treatment for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation/subluxation (IFRP), and capsular-fixation IOL in-the-bag implantation (IB). Pupil size was measured preoperatively for the IFPH- and IB-group as well as 6 months after surgery for all groups. We analyzed a total of 70 eyes: 22 eyes of 11 patients with phakic IOLs, 22 eyes of 20 patients in the IFRP group and 26 eyes of 13 patients in the IB group. Both IFPH and IB showed a smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size, compared with the preoperative values. When compared to postoperative values of IB and IFPH, IFRP showed a significantly smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size (IFPH: 5.89 ± 0.83 mm, IFRP: 4.37 ± 0.83 mm, IB: 5.34 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.001) while no differences were seen at high-mesopic lighting. Neither of the surgical techniques seems to impair the constriction of the pupil.Yanxiu SunMaximilian HammerTimur M. YildirimRamin KhoramniaGerd U. AuffarthNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Yanxiu Sun
Maximilian Hammer
Timur M. Yildirim
Ramin Khoramnia
Gerd U. Auffarth
Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
description Abstract An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and high-mesopic = 4 lx) for anterior iris-claw IOL fixation for correcting myopia or hyperopia (IFPH), retropupillary iris-claw IOL fixation to correct aphakia or as treatment for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation/subluxation (IFRP), and capsular-fixation IOL in-the-bag implantation (IB). Pupil size was measured preoperatively for the IFPH- and IB-group as well as 6 months after surgery for all groups. We analyzed a total of 70 eyes: 22 eyes of 11 patients with phakic IOLs, 22 eyes of 20 patients in the IFRP group and 26 eyes of 13 patients in the IB group. Both IFPH and IB showed a smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size, compared with the preoperative values. When compared to postoperative values of IB and IFPH, IFRP showed a significantly smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size (IFPH: 5.89 ± 0.83 mm, IFRP: 4.37 ± 0.83 mm, IB: 5.34 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.001) while no differences were seen at high-mesopic lighting. Neither of the surgical techniques seems to impair the constriction of the pupil.
format article
author Yanxiu Sun
Maximilian Hammer
Timur M. Yildirim
Ramin Khoramnia
Gerd U. Auffarth
author_facet Yanxiu Sun
Maximilian Hammer
Timur M. Yildirim
Ramin Khoramnia
Gerd U. Auffarth
author_sort Yanxiu Sun
title Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_short Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_full Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_fullStr Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_full_unstemmed Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_sort pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c
work_keys_str_mv AT yanxiusun pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT maximilianhammer pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT timurmyildirim pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT raminkhoramnia pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT gerduauffarth pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
_version_ 1718442580327268352