Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
Abstract An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 ...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c2021-11-08T10:52:31ZPupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation10.1038/s41598-021-01051-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01051-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and high-mesopic = 4 lx) for anterior iris-claw IOL fixation for correcting myopia or hyperopia (IFPH), retropupillary iris-claw IOL fixation to correct aphakia or as treatment for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation/subluxation (IFRP), and capsular-fixation IOL in-the-bag implantation (IB). Pupil size was measured preoperatively for the IFPH- and IB-group as well as 6 months after surgery for all groups. We analyzed a total of 70 eyes: 22 eyes of 11 patients with phakic IOLs, 22 eyes of 20 patients in the IFRP group and 26 eyes of 13 patients in the IB group. Both IFPH and IB showed a smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size, compared with the preoperative values. When compared to postoperative values of IB and IFPH, IFRP showed a significantly smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size (IFPH: 5.89 ± 0.83 mm, IFRP: 4.37 ± 0.83 mm, IB: 5.34 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.001) while no differences were seen at high-mesopic lighting. Neither of the surgical techniques seems to impair the constriction of the pupil.Yanxiu SunMaximilian HammerTimur M. YildirimRamin KhoramniaGerd U. AuffarthNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Yanxiu Sun Maximilian Hammer Timur M. Yildirim Ramin Khoramnia Gerd U. Auffarth Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation |
description |
Abstract An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and high-mesopic = 4 lx) for anterior iris-claw IOL fixation for correcting myopia or hyperopia (IFPH), retropupillary iris-claw IOL fixation to correct aphakia or as treatment for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation/subluxation (IFRP), and capsular-fixation IOL in-the-bag implantation (IB). Pupil size was measured preoperatively for the IFPH- and IB-group as well as 6 months after surgery for all groups. We analyzed a total of 70 eyes: 22 eyes of 11 patients with phakic IOLs, 22 eyes of 20 patients in the IFRP group and 26 eyes of 13 patients in the IB group. Both IFPH and IB showed a smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size, compared with the preoperative values. When compared to postoperative values of IB and IFPH, IFRP showed a significantly smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size (IFPH: 5.89 ± 0.83 mm, IFRP: 4.37 ± 0.83 mm, IB: 5.34 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.001) while no differences were seen at high-mesopic lighting. Neither of the surgical techniques seems to impair the constriction of the pupil. |
format |
article |
author |
Yanxiu Sun Maximilian Hammer Timur M. Yildirim Ramin Khoramnia Gerd U. Auffarth |
author_facet |
Yanxiu Sun Maximilian Hammer Timur M. Yildirim Ramin Khoramnia Gerd U. Auffarth |
author_sort |
Yanxiu Sun |
title |
Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation |
title_short |
Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation |
title_full |
Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation |
title_fullStr |
Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation |
title_sort |
pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f8d56a5e984d4b40b13a511457c8b30c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yanxiusun pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation AT maximilianhammer pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation AT timurmyildirim pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation AT raminkhoramnia pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation AT gerduauffarth pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation |
_version_ |
1718442580327268352 |