Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study

Abstract Objectives To examine ridge dimensional changes and histologic parameters of healing when ridge preservation (RP) was performed at molar sites using dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane alone, without a bone graft. Material and Methods Eighteen patients had molar extraction and RP...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Arwa M. Al Hugail, Brian L. Mealey, Christopher Walker, Shaimaa Al Harthi, Mylinh Duong, Marcel Noujeim, David J. Lasho, Thomas J. Prihoda, Guy Huynh‐Ba
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	alveolar bone grafting bone resorption dental implants tooth extraction Dentistry RK1-715
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f8edc99f29c34fde9b89e1b985cf662e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f8edc99f29c34fde9b89e1b985cf662e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f8edc99f29c34fde9b89e1b985cf662e2021-12-02T12:59:21ZEvaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study2057-434710.1002/cre2.459https://doaj.org/article/f8edc99f29c34fde9b89e1b985cf662e2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.459https://doaj.org/toc/2057-4347Abstract Objectives To examine ridge dimensional changes and histologic parameters of healing when ridge preservation (RP) was performed at molar sites using dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane alone, without a bone graft. Material and Methods Eighteen patients had molar extraction and RP using dPTFE membrane alone. Ridge dimensions were measured using two standardized cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans taken within 72 h and 3 months following extraction. Following a 3‐month healing period, an implant osteotomy was prepared using a trephine drill and bone cores were collected for histological analysis. Four‐arm analyses were performed using data from three previously published study arms of the same research group. Results There was a significant change in the buccal ridge height between the four groups at all aspects of the socket. Alveolar ridge width reduction at 3 mm from crest for all aspects (mesial, midpoint, distal) of the socket showed statistically significant difference for dPTFE alone group compared to the other three groups. Percentage of vital bone formation (62.10%) was significantly greater in dPTFE alone group compared to the other groups. Conclusions RP using dPTFE membrane alone in molar sites with intact socket walls showed successful outcomes in maintaining ridge dimensions and in histologic wound healing.Arwa M. Al HugailBrian L. MealeyChristopher WalkerShaimaa Al HarthiMylinh DuongMarcel NoujeimDavid J. LashoThomas J. PrihodaGuy Huynh‐BaWileyarticlealveolar bone graftingbone resorptiondental implantstooth extractionDentistryRK1-715ENClinical and Experimental Dental Research, Vol 7, Iss 6, Pp 1103-1111 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	alveolar bone grafting bone resorption dental implants tooth extraction Dentistry RK1-715
spellingShingle	alveolar bone grafting bone resorption dental implants tooth extraction Dentistry RK1-715 Arwa M. Al Hugail Brian L. Mealey Christopher Walker Shaimaa Al Harthi Mylinh Duong Marcel Noujeim David J. Lasho Thomas J. Prihoda Guy Huynh‐Ba Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study
description	Abstract Objectives To examine ridge dimensional changes and histologic parameters of healing when ridge preservation (RP) was performed at molar sites using dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane alone, without a bone graft. Material and Methods Eighteen patients had molar extraction and RP using dPTFE membrane alone. Ridge dimensions were measured using two standardized cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans taken within 72 h and 3 months following extraction. Following a 3‐month healing period, an implant osteotomy was prepared using a trephine drill and bone cores were collected for histological analysis. Four‐arm analyses were performed using data from three previously published study arms of the same research group. Results There was a significant change in the buccal ridge height between the four groups at all aspects of the socket. Alveolar ridge width reduction at 3 mm from crest for all aspects (mesial, midpoint, distal) of the socket showed statistically significant difference for dPTFE alone group compared to the other three groups. Percentage of vital bone formation (62.10%) was significantly greater in dPTFE alone group compared to the other groups. Conclusions RP using dPTFE membrane alone in molar sites with intact socket walls showed successful outcomes in maintaining ridge dimensions and in histologic wound healing.
format	article
author	Arwa M. Al Hugail Brian L. Mealey Christopher Walker Shaimaa Al Harthi Mylinh Duong Marcel Noujeim David J. Lasho Thomas J. Prihoda Guy Huynh‐Ba
author_facet	Arwa M. Al Hugail Brian L. Mealey Christopher Walker Shaimaa Al Harthi Mylinh Duong Marcel Noujeim David J. Lasho Thomas J. Prihoda Guy Huynh‐Ba
author_sort	Arwa M. Al Hugail
title	Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study
title_short	Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study
title_full	Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study
title_fullStr	Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study
title_sort	evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: a four‐arm cohort prospective study
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/f8edc99f29c34fde9b89e1b985cf662e
work_keys_str_mv	AT arwamalhugail evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT brianlmealey evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT christopherwalker evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT shaimaaalharthi evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT mylinhduong evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT marcelnoujeim evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT davidjlasho evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT thomasjprihoda evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy AT guyhuynhba evaluationofhealingatmolarextractionsiteswithridgepreservationusinganonresorbabledensepolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneafourarmcohortprospectivestudy
_version_	1718393601999765504

Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with ridge preservation using a non‐resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A four‐arm cohort prospective study

Ejemplares similares