Evaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield

The objective of this study was to test pre-treatment hydrologic calibration relationships between paired headwater watersheds (WS77 (treatment) and WS80 (control)) and explain the difference in flow, compared to earlier published data, using daily rainfall, runoff, and a water table measured during...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devendra M. Amatya, Ssegane Herbert, Carl C. Trettin, Mohammad Daud Hamidi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f9033607bac04d4caf0512ecdb8b7ed8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f9033607bac04d4caf0512ecdb8b7ed8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f9033607bac04d4caf0512ecdb8b7ed82021-11-11T19:57:58ZEvaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield10.3390/w132131212073-4441https://doaj.org/article/f9033607bac04d4caf0512ecdb8b7ed82021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/21/3121https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4441The objective of this study was to test pre-treatment hydrologic calibration relationships between paired headwater watersheds (WS77 (treatment) and WS80 (control)) and explain the difference in flow, compared to earlier published data, using daily rainfall, runoff, and a water table measured during 2011–2019 in the Santee Experimental Forest in coastal South Carolina, USA. Mean monthly runoff difference between WS80 and WS77 of −6.80 mm for 2011–2019, excluding October 2015 with an extreme flow event, did not differ significantly from −8.57 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.27) for the 1969–1978 period or from −3.89 mm for 2004–2011, the post-Hurricane Hugo (1989) recovery period. Both the mean annual runoff coefficient and monthly runoff were non-significantly higher for WS77 than for WS80. The insignificant higher runoff by chance was attributed to WS77’s three times smaller surface storage and higher hypsometrical integral than those of WS80, but not to rainfall. The 2011–2019 geometric mean regression-based monthly runoff calibration relationship, excluding the October 2015 runoff, did not differ from the relationship for the post-Hugo recovery period, indicating complete recovery of the forest stand by 2011. The 2011–2019 pre-treatment regression relationship, which was not affected by periodic prescribed burning on WS77, was significant and predictable, providing a basis for quantifying longleaf pine restoration effects on runoff later in the future. However, the relationship will have to be used cautiously when extrapolating for extremely large flow events that exceed its flow bounds.Devendra M. AmatyaSsegane HerbertCarl C. TrettinMohammad Daud HamidiMDPI AGarticlerainfallrunoff coefficientwater tablesurface storagesoil water storageevapotranspirationHydraulic engineeringTC1-978Water supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500ENWater, Vol 13, Iss 3121, p 3121 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic rainfall
runoff coefficient
water table
surface storage
soil water storage
evapotranspiration
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
spellingShingle rainfall
runoff coefficient
water table
surface storage
soil water storage
evapotranspiration
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
Devendra M. Amatya
Ssegane Herbert
Carl C. Trettin
Mohammad Daud Hamidi
Evaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield
description The objective of this study was to test pre-treatment hydrologic calibration relationships between paired headwater watersheds (WS77 (treatment) and WS80 (control)) and explain the difference in flow, compared to earlier published data, using daily rainfall, runoff, and a water table measured during 2011–2019 in the Santee Experimental Forest in coastal South Carolina, USA. Mean monthly runoff difference between WS80 and WS77 of −6.80 mm for 2011–2019, excluding October 2015 with an extreme flow event, did not differ significantly from −8.57 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.27) for the 1969–1978 period or from −3.89 mm for 2004–2011, the post-Hurricane Hugo (1989) recovery period. Both the mean annual runoff coefficient and monthly runoff were non-significantly higher for WS77 than for WS80. The insignificant higher runoff by chance was attributed to WS77’s three times smaller surface storage and higher hypsometrical integral than those of WS80, but not to rainfall. The 2011–2019 geometric mean regression-based monthly runoff calibration relationship, excluding the October 2015 runoff, did not differ from the relationship for the post-Hugo recovery period, indicating complete recovery of the forest stand by 2011. The 2011–2019 pre-treatment regression relationship, which was not affected by periodic prescribed burning on WS77, was significant and predictable, providing a basis for quantifying longleaf pine restoration effects on runoff later in the future. However, the relationship will have to be used cautiously when extrapolating for extremely large flow events that exceed its flow bounds.
format article
author Devendra M. Amatya
Ssegane Herbert
Carl C. Trettin
Mohammad Daud Hamidi
author_facet Devendra M. Amatya
Ssegane Herbert
Carl C. Trettin
Mohammad Daud Hamidi
author_sort Devendra M. Amatya
title Evaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield
title_short Evaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield
title_full Evaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield
title_fullStr Evaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Paired Watershed Runoff Relationships since Recovery from a Major Hurricane on a Coastal Forest—A Basis for Examining Effects of <i>Pinus palustris</i> Restoration on Water Yield
title_sort evaluation of paired watershed runoff relationships since recovery from a major hurricane on a coastal forest—a basis for examining effects of <i>pinus palustris</i> restoration on water yield
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f9033607bac04d4caf0512ecdb8b7ed8
work_keys_str_mv AT devendramamatya evaluationofpairedwatershedrunoffrelationshipssincerecoveryfromamajorhurricaneonacoastalforestabasisforexaminingeffectsofipinuspalustrisirestorationonwateryield
AT sseganeherbert evaluationofpairedwatershedrunoffrelationshipssincerecoveryfromamajorhurricaneonacoastalforestabasisforexaminingeffectsofipinuspalustrisirestorationonwateryield
AT carlctrettin evaluationofpairedwatershedrunoffrelationshipssincerecoveryfromamajorhurricaneonacoastalforestabasisforexaminingeffectsofipinuspalustrisirestorationonwateryield
AT mohammaddaudhamidi evaluationofpairedwatershedrunoffrelationshipssincerecoveryfromamajorhurricaneonacoastalforestabasisforexaminingeffectsofipinuspalustrisirestorationonwateryield
_version_ 1718431385619791872