In vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.

We characterized the in vivo importance of the homologous recombination factor RAD54 for the developing mouse brain cortex in normal conditions or after ionizing radiation exposure. Contrary to numerous homologous recombination genes, Rad54 disruption did not impact the cortical development without...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laure Rousseau, Olivier Etienne, Telma Roque, Chantal Desmaze, Céline Haton, Marc-André Mouthon, Jacqueline Bernardino-Sgherri, Jeroen Essers, Roland Kanaar, François D Boussin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f95c774b93764c7aa02cb09eb5f9819e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f95c774b93764c7aa02cb09eb5f9819e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f95c774b93764c7aa02cb09eb5f9819e2021-11-18T07:17:10ZIn vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0037194https://doaj.org/article/f95c774b93764c7aa02cb09eb5f9819e2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22666344/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203We characterized the in vivo importance of the homologous recombination factor RAD54 for the developing mouse brain cortex in normal conditions or after ionizing radiation exposure. Contrary to numerous homologous recombination genes, Rad54 disruption did not impact the cortical development without exogenous stress, but it dramatically enhanced the radiation sensitivity of neural stem and progenitor cells. This resulted in the death of all cells irradiated during S or G2, whereas the viability of cells irradiated in G1 or G0 was not affected by Rad54 disruption. Apoptosis occurred after long arrests at intra-S and G2/M checkpoints. This concerned every type of neural stem and progenitor cells, showing that the importance of Rad54 for radiation response was linked to the cell cycle phase at the time of irradiation and not to the differentiation state. In the developing brain, RAD54-dependent homologous recombination appeared absolutely required for the repair of damages induced by ionizing radiation during S and G2 phases, but not for the repair of endogenous damages in normal conditions. Altogether our data support the existence of RAD54-dependent and -independent homologous recombination pathways.Laure RousseauOlivier EtienneTelma RoqueChantal DesmazeCéline HatonMarc-André MouthonJacqueline Bernardino-SgherriJeroen EssersRoland KanaarFrançois D BoussinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 5, p e37194 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Laure Rousseau
Olivier Etienne
Telma Roque
Chantal Desmaze
Céline Haton
Marc-André Mouthon
Jacqueline Bernardino-Sgherri
Jeroen Essers
Roland Kanaar
François D Boussin
In vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.
description We characterized the in vivo importance of the homologous recombination factor RAD54 for the developing mouse brain cortex in normal conditions or after ionizing radiation exposure. Contrary to numerous homologous recombination genes, Rad54 disruption did not impact the cortical development without exogenous stress, but it dramatically enhanced the radiation sensitivity of neural stem and progenitor cells. This resulted in the death of all cells irradiated during S or G2, whereas the viability of cells irradiated in G1 or G0 was not affected by Rad54 disruption. Apoptosis occurred after long arrests at intra-S and G2/M checkpoints. This concerned every type of neural stem and progenitor cells, showing that the importance of Rad54 for radiation response was linked to the cell cycle phase at the time of irradiation and not to the differentiation state. In the developing brain, RAD54-dependent homologous recombination appeared absolutely required for the repair of damages induced by ionizing radiation during S and G2 phases, but not for the repair of endogenous damages in normal conditions. Altogether our data support the existence of RAD54-dependent and -independent homologous recombination pathways.
format article
author Laure Rousseau
Olivier Etienne
Telma Roque
Chantal Desmaze
Céline Haton
Marc-André Mouthon
Jacqueline Bernardino-Sgherri
Jeroen Essers
Roland Kanaar
François D Boussin
author_facet Laure Rousseau
Olivier Etienne
Telma Roque
Chantal Desmaze
Céline Haton
Marc-André Mouthon
Jacqueline Bernardino-Sgherri
Jeroen Essers
Roland Kanaar
François D Boussin
author_sort Laure Rousseau
title In vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.
title_short In vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.
title_full In vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.
title_fullStr In vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.
title_full_unstemmed In vivo importance of homologous recombination DNA repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.
title_sort in vivo importance of homologous recombination dna repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/f95c774b93764c7aa02cb09eb5f9819e
work_keys_str_mv AT laurerousseau invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT olivieretienne invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT telmaroque invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT chantaldesmaze invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT celinehaton invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT marcandremouthon invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT jacquelinebernardinosgherri invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT jeroenessers invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT rolandkanaar invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT francoisdboussin invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
_version_ 1718423702316515328