Indicators of Support in Online Interaction

Peer-to-peer interaction using computer-mediated communication (CMC) would appear to be a promising source of timely and cost-effective student support, but little empirical evidence regarding actual participant support behaviour has been presented (Lee, 2000). This paper reports a study of the occu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Patrick J. Fahy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f96ed1ff31b04114a813c164e5a5a16b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f96ed1ff31b04114a813c164e5a5a16b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f96ed1ff31b04114a813c164e5a5a16b2021-12-02T19:26:05ZIndicators of Support in Online Interaction10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.1291492-3831https://doaj.org/article/f96ed1ff31b04114a813c164e5a5a16b2003-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/129https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831Peer-to-peer interaction using computer-mediated communication (CMC) would appear to be a promising source of timely and cost-effective student support, but little empirical evidence regarding actual participant support behaviour has been presented (Lee, 2000). This paper reports a study of the occurrence of 13 online strategies defined as “supportive,” according to the categorizations found in an instrument called the Transcript Analysis Tool (TAT). The corpus used in the study consisted of three transcripts produced by students (graduate degree and professional development diploma candidates) engaged in course-related CMC conferencing. Analysis of the transcripts generated by the three groups showed the following: The support strategies most frequently used by the three groups were referential statements (statements which made reference to others’ previous comments; TAT type 2B), signatures, greetings, and horizontal questions (open-ended questions which invited negotiation of a plausible answer; TAT type 1B). There was some variability among the groups in the frequency of use of referential statements, horizontal questions, emoticons, and invitations to others. High- and low-support groups differed from each other in their use of referential statements, signatures, greetings, horizontal questions, rhetorical questions, and humour. As an examination of the social element of three communities of inquiry, the study described how members of these groups attempted to connect with one another interpersonally, using asynchronous conferencing, on topics related to the conceptual content of the courses. The paper concludes that while in this case the above behaviours were the means most often used to support and encourage interaction, further examination of online support behaviours and strategies is needed, especially in relation to valued outcomes such as persistence, greater motivation, less stress, and, ultimately, enhanced learning. Patrick J. FahyAthabasca University PressarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2003)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Patrick J. Fahy
Indicators of Support in Online Interaction
description Peer-to-peer interaction using computer-mediated communication (CMC) would appear to be a promising source of timely and cost-effective student support, but little empirical evidence regarding actual participant support behaviour has been presented (Lee, 2000). This paper reports a study of the occurrence of 13 online strategies defined as “supportive,” according to the categorizations found in an instrument called the Transcript Analysis Tool (TAT). The corpus used in the study consisted of three transcripts produced by students (graduate degree and professional development diploma candidates) engaged in course-related CMC conferencing. Analysis of the transcripts generated by the three groups showed the following: The support strategies most frequently used by the three groups were referential statements (statements which made reference to others’ previous comments; TAT type 2B), signatures, greetings, and horizontal questions (open-ended questions which invited negotiation of a plausible answer; TAT type 1B). There was some variability among the groups in the frequency of use of referential statements, horizontal questions, emoticons, and invitations to others. High- and low-support groups differed from each other in their use of referential statements, signatures, greetings, horizontal questions, rhetorical questions, and humour. As an examination of the social element of three communities of inquiry, the study described how members of these groups attempted to connect with one another interpersonally, using asynchronous conferencing, on topics related to the conceptual content of the courses. The paper concludes that while in this case the above behaviours were the means most often used to support and encourage interaction, further examination of online support behaviours and strategies is needed, especially in relation to valued outcomes such as persistence, greater motivation, less stress, and, ultimately, enhanced learning.
format article
author Patrick J. Fahy
author_facet Patrick J. Fahy
author_sort Patrick J. Fahy
title Indicators of Support in Online Interaction
title_short Indicators of Support in Online Interaction
title_full Indicators of Support in Online Interaction
title_fullStr Indicators of Support in Online Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Indicators of Support in Online Interaction
title_sort indicators of support in online interaction
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2003
url https://doaj.org/article/f96ed1ff31b04114a813c164e5a5a16b
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickjfahy indicatorsofsupportinonlineinteraction
_version_ 1718376535617961984