Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals

Tomohiro Nizawa, Takayuki Baba, Masayasu Kitahashi, Toshiyuki Oshitari, Shuichi Yamamoto Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan Purpose: To determine the differences in the retinal sensitivities obtained by microperimetry with a s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nizawa T, Baba T, Kitahashi M, Oshitari T, Yamamoto S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f978b84ca2a04e80ad474d4cd5620b62
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f978b84ca2a04e80ad474d4cd5620b62
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f978b84ca2a04e80ad474d4cd5620b622021-12-02T07:59:01ZDifferent fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/f978b84ca2a04e80ad474d4cd5620b622017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/different-fixation-targets-affect-retinal-sensitivity-obtained-by-micr-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Tomohiro Nizawa, Takayuki Baba, Masayasu Kitahashi, Toshiyuki Oshitari, Shuichi Yamamoto Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan Purpose: To determine the differences in the retinal sensitivities obtained by microperimetry with a single cross or a circular fixation target in normal individuals.Methods: Thirty-two eyes of 16 healthy volunteers (mean age 28.9±1.4 years, range 24–44 years) were studied. The retinal sensitivity of the central 0 degrees and of the mean central 2 degrees consisting of 8 points were determined independently using the two different fixation targets with Microperimeter 3. The Goldmann III stimulus with a luminance of 1.0 cd/m2 was presented for 200 ms on a white background.Results: The retinal sensitivity of the central 0 degrees was significantly better with the circular target than that with the cross target (P=0.003, right eyes; P=0.001, left eyes). The mean retinal sensitivity in the central 2 degrees was not significantly different between the cross and circular fixation targets. (P=0.07, right eyes; P=0.08, left eyes).Conclusion: These results indicate that the circular fixation target is a better target to use to evaluate the central retinal sensitivity. The difference in the retinal sensitivity is most likely due to the cross fixation target overlapping the test stimulus target. Keywords: microperimetry, retinal sensitivity, fixation targets, stimuliNizawa TBaba TKitahashi MOshitari TYamamoto SDove Medical Pressarticlemicroperimetryretinal sensitivityfixation targetsstimuliOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 2011-2015 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic microperimetry
retinal sensitivity
fixation targets
stimuli
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle microperimetry
retinal sensitivity
fixation targets
stimuli
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Nizawa T
Baba T
Kitahashi M
Oshitari T
Yamamoto S
Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals
description Tomohiro Nizawa, Takayuki Baba, Masayasu Kitahashi, Toshiyuki Oshitari, Shuichi Yamamoto Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan Purpose: To determine the differences in the retinal sensitivities obtained by microperimetry with a single cross or a circular fixation target in normal individuals.Methods: Thirty-two eyes of 16 healthy volunteers (mean age 28.9±1.4 years, range 24–44 years) were studied. The retinal sensitivity of the central 0 degrees and of the mean central 2 degrees consisting of 8 points were determined independently using the two different fixation targets with Microperimeter 3. The Goldmann III stimulus with a luminance of 1.0 cd/m2 was presented for 200 ms on a white background.Results: The retinal sensitivity of the central 0 degrees was significantly better with the circular target than that with the cross target (P=0.003, right eyes; P=0.001, left eyes). The mean retinal sensitivity in the central 2 degrees was not significantly different between the cross and circular fixation targets. (P=0.07, right eyes; P=0.08, left eyes).Conclusion: These results indicate that the circular fixation target is a better target to use to evaluate the central retinal sensitivity. The difference in the retinal sensitivity is most likely due to the cross fixation target overlapping the test stimulus target. Keywords: microperimetry, retinal sensitivity, fixation targets, stimuli
format article
author Nizawa T
Baba T
Kitahashi M
Oshitari T
Yamamoto S
author_facet Nizawa T
Baba T
Kitahashi M
Oshitari T
Yamamoto S
author_sort Nizawa T
title Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals
title_short Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals
title_full Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals
title_fullStr Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals
title_full_unstemmed Different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals
title_sort different fixation targets affect retinal sensitivity obtained by microperimetry in normal individuals
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/f978b84ca2a04e80ad474d4cd5620b62
work_keys_str_mv AT nizawat differentfixationtargetsaffectretinalsensitivityobtainedbymicroperimetryinnormalindividuals
AT babat differentfixationtargetsaffectretinalsensitivityobtainedbymicroperimetryinnormalindividuals
AT kitahashim differentfixationtargetsaffectretinalsensitivityobtainedbymicroperimetryinnormalindividuals
AT oshitarit differentfixationtargetsaffectretinalsensitivityobtainedbymicroperimetryinnormalindividuals
AT yamamotos differentfixationtargetsaffectretinalsensitivityobtainedbymicroperimetryinnormalindividuals
_version_ 1718398761600811008