Three heads are better than two: Comparing learning properties and performances across individuals, dyads, and triads through a computational approach.
Although it is considered that two heads are better than one, related studies argued that groups rarely outperform their best members. This study examined not only whether two heads are better than one but also whether three heads are better than two or one in the context of two-armed bandit problem...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Tsutomu Harada |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/f97c4484c26e43789bb180ad738e75e7 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Synchrony as a measure of conversation difficulty: Movement coherence increases with background noise level and complexity in dyads and triads.
by: Lauren V Hadley, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Nanoparticles for Magnetic Heating: When Two (or More) Is Better Than One
by: Jesus G. Ovejero, et al.
Published: (2021) -
When Two are Better Than One: Synthesizing Heavily Unbalanced Data
by: Francisco Ferreira, et al.
Published: (2021) -
LANGUAGE AND CULTURE: DYAD AND UNITY
by: A. L. Semenov, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Is 20 Hz Whole-Body Vibration Training Better for Older Individuals than 40 Hz?
by: Shiuan-Yu Tseng, et al.
Published: (2021)