Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century

The article presents the results of the study of should -constructions in the penitentiary instructions of the 19th century. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that the data obtained will complement the understanding of the means of expression of the category of directivity in the period o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	L. M. Golikov, O. V. Druzhininskaya
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2019
Materias:	language of legislation prison instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> century modality of obligation form of a normative obligation form of a need Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f9e6d316bcf44b9b8a2c72bed9ca256a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f9e6d316bcf44b9b8a2c72bed9ca256a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f9e6d316bcf44b9b8a2c72bed9ca256a2021-12-02T07:58:08ZForms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-9-23https://doaj.org/article/f9e6d316bcf44b9b8a2c72bed9ca256a2019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1293https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article presents the results of the study of should -constructions in the penitentiary instructions of the 19th century. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that the data obtained will complement the understanding of the means of expression of the category of directivity in the period of formation of the language of penal legislation. The novelty of the work is seen primarily in the fact that the forms of expression of the meaning of obligation are studied in legal discourse as a means of linguistic construction of the legal norm. In addition, the sources are the texts not previously studied from a linguistic standpoint. The article seeks to identify distinctive signs, allowing to differentiate between deontic and non-deontic necessity in legal discourse. Based on the idea that the basic semantic indicator of deontic or non-deontic statements with the meaning of obligation is the nature of the relationship of the subjects of obligation, the authors distinguish between the forms of a normative obligation and a need. The first, having in its syntactic structure the position of an agent, imply the ratio of subjects through the force of coercion. The second, active constructions with non-agentive subject, are determined by the opposition of the subject-addressee of obligation, implementing the modes of need and aspiration, and the subject of voluntariness, which in turn implements a strong-willed impact on an agent that bears an non-normative character.L. M. GolikovO. V. DruzhininskayaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlelanguage of legislationprison instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> centurymodality of obligationform of a normative obligationform of a needSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 9, Pp 9-23 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	language of legislation prison instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> century modality of obligation form of a normative obligation form of a need Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	language of legislation prison instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> century modality of obligation form of a normative obligation form of a need Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 L. M. Golikov O. V. Druzhininskaya Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
description	The article presents the results of the study of should -constructions in the penitentiary instructions of the 19th century. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that the data obtained will complement the understanding of the means of expression of the category of directivity in the period of formation of the language of penal legislation. The novelty of the work is seen primarily in the fact that the forms of expression of the meaning of obligation are studied in legal discourse as a means of linguistic construction of the legal norm. In addition, the sources are the texts not previously studied from a linguistic standpoint. The article seeks to identify distinctive signs, allowing to differentiate between deontic and non-deontic necessity in legal discourse. Based on the idea that the basic semantic indicator of deontic or non-deontic statements with the meaning of obligation is the nature of the relationship of the subjects of obligation, the authors distinguish between the forms of a normative obligation and a need. The first, having in its syntactic structure the position of an agent, imply the ratio of subjects through the force of coercion. The second, active constructions with non-agentive subject, are determined by the opposition of the subject-addressee of obligation, implementing the modes of need and aspiration, and the subject of voluntariness, which in turn implements a strong-willed impact on an agent that bears an non-normative character.
format	article
author	L. M. Golikov O. V. Druzhininskaya
author_facet	L. M. Golikov O. V. Druzhininskaya
author_sort	L. M. Golikov
title	Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_short	Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_full	Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_fullStr	Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_full_unstemmed	Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_sort	forms of obligation in penitentiary instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> century
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/f9e6d316bcf44b9b8a2c72bed9ca256a
work_keys_str_mv	AT lmgolikov formsofobligationinpenitentiaryinstructionof19supthsupcentury AT ovdruzhininskaya formsofobligationinpenitentiaryinstructionof19supthsupcentury
_version_	1718398891408228352

Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century

Ejemplares similares