Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
Abstract Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b2021-11-23T08:30:52ZPresence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine1831-473210.2903/j.efsa.2021.6881https://doaj.org/article/f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6881https://doaj.org/toc/1831-4732Abstract Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA to investigate the available sources of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine. European Commission also asked EFSA to provide approaches that would distinguish SEM occurring due to illegal treatment with nitrofurazone from SEM produced during food processing. The literature indicates that SEM, both free and bound to macromolecules, could occur also in food products such as gelatine, during food processing, arising from the use of disinfecting agents and/or from reactions of various food components and, therefore, SEM cannot be considered as an unequivocal marker of the abuse of nitrofurazone in animal production. It is recommended to investigate in more detail which processing conditions lead to the formation of SEM in gelatine during its production and what levels can be found. One potential approach to distinguishing between SEM from nitrofurazone and SEM from other sources in food products, such as gelatine, might be based on determining the ratio of bound:free SEM in a sample of gelatine. However, whether the ratio of bound:free SEM would unequivocally distinguish between SEM arising from nitrofurazone abuse or from other sources still needs to be demonstrated.European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Michael O'KeeffeAnna ChristodoulidouCarlo NebbiaWileyarticlesemicarbazideSEMnitrofurazonegelatinenitrofuransnitrofuran metabolitesNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641Chemical technologyTP1-1185ENEFSA Journal, Vol 19, Iss 10, Pp n/a-n/a (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
semicarbazide SEM nitrofurazone gelatine nitrofurans nitrofuran metabolites Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Chemical technology TP1-1185 |
spellingShingle |
semicarbazide SEM nitrofurazone gelatine nitrofurans nitrofuran metabolites Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Chemical technology TP1-1185 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Michael O'Keeffe Anna Christodoulidou Carlo Nebbia Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine |
description |
Abstract Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA to investigate the available sources of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine. European Commission also asked EFSA to provide approaches that would distinguish SEM occurring due to illegal treatment with nitrofurazone from SEM produced during food processing. The literature indicates that SEM, both free and bound to macromolecules, could occur also in food products such as gelatine, during food processing, arising from the use of disinfecting agents and/or from reactions of various food components and, therefore, SEM cannot be considered as an unequivocal marker of the abuse of nitrofurazone in animal production. It is recommended to investigate in more detail which processing conditions lead to the formation of SEM in gelatine during its production and what levels can be found. One potential approach to distinguishing between SEM from nitrofurazone and SEM from other sources in food products, such as gelatine, might be based on determining the ratio of bound:free SEM in a sample of gelatine. However, whether the ratio of bound:free SEM would unequivocally distinguish between SEM arising from nitrofurazone abuse or from other sources still needs to be demonstrated. |
format |
article |
author |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Michael O'Keeffe Anna Christodoulidou Carlo Nebbia |
author_facet |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Michael O'Keeffe Anna Christodoulidou Carlo Nebbia |
author_sort |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
title |
Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine |
title_short |
Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine |
title_full |
Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine |
title_fullStr |
Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine |
title_sort |
presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT europeanfoodsafetyauthorityefsa presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine AT michaelokeeffe presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine AT annachristodoulidou presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine AT carlonebbia presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine |
_version_ |
1718416862116577280 |