Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine

Abstract Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Michael O'Keeffe, Anna Christodoulidou, Carlo Nebbia
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
SEM
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b2021-11-23T08:30:52ZPresence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine1831-473210.2903/j.efsa.2021.6881https://doaj.org/article/f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6881https://doaj.org/toc/1831-4732Abstract Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA to investigate the available sources of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine. European Commission also asked EFSA to provide approaches that would distinguish SEM occurring due to illegal treatment with nitrofurazone from SEM produced during food processing. The literature indicates that SEM, both free and bound to macromolecules, could occur also in food products such as gelatine, during food processing, arising from the use of disinfecting agents and/or from reactions of various food components and, therefore, SEM cannot be considered as an unequivocal marker of the abuse of nitrofurazone in animal production. It is recommended to investigate in more detail which processing conditions lead to the formation of SEM in gelatine during its production and what levels can be found. One potential approach to distinguishing between SEM from nitrofurazone and SEM from other sources in food products, such as gelatine, might be based on determining the ratio of bound:free SEM in a sample of gelatine. However, whether the ratio of bound:free SEM would unequivocally distinguish between SEM arising from nitrofurazone abuse or from other sources still needs to be demonstrated.European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Michael O'KeeffeAnna ChristodoulidouCarlo NebbiaWileyarticlesemicarbazideSEMnitrofurazonegelatinenitrofuransnitrofuran metabolitesNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641Chemical technologyTP1-1185ENEFSA Journal, Vol 19, Iss 10, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic semicarbazide
SEM
nitrofurazone
gelatine
nitrofurans
nitrofuran metabolites
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle semicarbazide
SEM
nitrofurazone
gelatine
nitrofurans
nitrofuran metabolites
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Michael O'Keeffe
Anna Christodoulidou
Carlo Nebbia
Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
description Abstract Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA to investigate the available sources of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine. European Commission also asked EFSA to provide approaches that would distinguish SEM occurring due to illegal treatment with nitrofurazone from SEM produced during food processing. The literature indicates that SEM, both free and bound to macromolecules, could occur also in food products such as gelatine, during food processing, arising from the use of disinfecting agents and/or from reactions of various food components and, therefore, SEM cannot be considered as an unequivocal marker of the abuse of nitrofurazone in animal production. It is recommended to investigate in more detail which processing conditions lead to the formation of SEM in gelatine during its production and what levels can be found. One potential approach to distinguishing between SEM from nitrofurazone and SEM from other sources in food products, such as gelatine, might be based on determining the ratio of bound:free SEM in a sample of gelatine. However, whether the ratio of bound:free SEM would unequivocally distinguish between SEM arising from nitrofurazone abuse or from other sources still needs to be demonstrated.
format article
author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Michael O'Keeffe
Anna Christodoulidou
Carlo Nebbia
author_facet European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Michael O'Keeffe
Anna Christodoulidou
Carlo Nebbia
author_sort European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
title Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_short Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_full Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_fullStr Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_full_unstemmed Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_sort presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f9f7b79bed164978aaf976dad308f97b
work_keys_str_mv AT europeanfoodsafetyauthorityefsa presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine
AT michaelokeeffe presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine
AT annachristodoulidou presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine
AT carlonebbia presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine
_version_ 1718416862116577280