Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection

Prioritising areas for conservation is hindered by disagreements over ecological targets. Here, Armsworth et al. combine a simulation approach and case study to test if considering economic return on investment aids in prioritisation, and find that its impact on reaching agreements varies greatly.

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Paul R. Armsworth, Heather B. Jackson, Seong-Hoon Cho, Melissa Clark, Joseph E. Fargione, Gwenllian D. Iacona, Taeyoung Kim, Eric R. Larson, Thomas Minney, Nathan A. Sutton
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/fa05169329094caeb6a8d8660db4ec3e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:fa05169329094caeb6a8d8660db4ec3e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:fa05169329094caeb6a8d8660db4ec3e2021-12-02T14:42:03ZFactoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection10.1038/s41467-017-02399-y2041-1723https://doaj.org/article/fa05169329094caeb6a8d8660db4ec3e2017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02399-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Prioritising areas for conservation is hindered by disagreements over ecological targets. Here, Armsworth et al. combine a simulation approach and case study to test if considering economic return on investment aids in prioritisation, and find that its impact on reaching agreements varies greatly.Paul R. ArmsworthHeather B. JacksonSeong-Hoon ChoMelissa ClarkJoseph E. FargioneGwenllian D. IaconaTaeyoung KimEric R. LarsonThomas MinneyNathan A. SuttonNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q Paul R. Armsworth Heather B. Jackson Seong-Hoon Cho Melissa Clark Joseph E. Fargione Gwenllian D. Iacona Taeyoung Kim Eric R. Larson Thomas Minney Nathan A. Sutton Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
description	Prioritising areas for conservation is hindered by disagreements over ecological targets. Here, Armsworth et al. combine a simulation approach and case study to test if considering economic return on investment aids in prioritisation, and find that its impact on reaching agreements varies greatly.
format	article
author	Paul R. Armsworth Heather B. Jackson Seong-Hoon Cho Melissa Clark Joseph E. Fargione Gwenllian D. Iacona Taeyoung Kim Eric R. Larson Thomas Minney Nathan A. Sutton
author_facet	Paul R. Armsworth Heather B. Jackson Seong-Hoon Cho Melissa Clark Joseph E. Fargione Gwenllian D. Iacona Taeyoung Kim Eric R. Larson Thomas Minney Nathan A. Sutton
author_sort	Paul R. Armsworth
title	Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
title_short	Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
title_full	Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
title_fullStr	Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
title_full_unstemmed	Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
title_sort	factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/fa05169329094caeb6a8d8660db4ec3e
work_keys_str_mv	AT paulrarmsworth factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT heatherbjackson factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT seonghooncho factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT melissaclark factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT josephefargione factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT gwenlliandiacona factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT taeyoungkim factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT ericrlarson factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT thomasminney factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection AT nathanasutton factoringeconomiccostsintoconservationplanningmaynotimproveagreementoverprioritiesforprotection
_version_	1718389847914184704

Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection

Ejemplares similares