Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
Prioritising areas for conservation is hindered by disagreements over ecological targets. Here, Armsworth et al. combine a simulation approach and case study to test if considering economic return on investment aids in prioritisation, and find that its impact on reaching agreements varies greatly.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Paul R. Armsworth, Heather B. Jackson, Seong-Hoon Cho, Melissa Clark, Joseph E. Fargione, Gwenllian D. Iacona, Taeyoung Kim, Eric R. Larson, Thomas Minney, Nathan A. Sutton |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fa05169329094caeb6a8d8660db4ec3e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Global diversity hotspots and conservation priorities for sharks.
por: Luis O Lucifora, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Conservation priorities in an endangered estuarine seahorse are informed by demographic history
por: Thomas Kalama Mkare, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Ranking and mapping the high conservation priority bird species of Saudi Arabia
por: Christopher R. J. Boland, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The value of increased spatial resolution of pesticide usage data for assessing risk to endangered species
por: Erin L. Murphy, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Priority areas for large mammal conservation in Equatorial Guinea.
por: Mizuki Murai, et al.
Publicado: (2013)