Network meta-analysis for clinicians
Decision making in clinical practice requires consideration of the relative efficacy and safety of medical interventions. A systematic review and meta-analysis, the results of which have the highest level of confidence in evidence-based medicine, only compare the effectiveness of two interventions,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Alexey A. Bogdanov, Andrey A. Bogdanov |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | RU |
Publicado: |
IP Habib O.N.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fa2deff846204e8e9fb53c4c9515d510 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Immunotherapy in breast cancer: A clinician's perspective
por: Sibapriya Chaudhuri, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of Different Systemic Therapeutic Regimes in Resectable Soft-Tissue Sarcoma—Results of a Network Meta-Analysis
por: Jan Haussmann, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of the efficacy of first-line therapy with different generations of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced EGFR-associated non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of overall survival data
por: Alexey A. Bogdanov, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitors as a Monotherapy for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
por: Hongmei Wang, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A common goal to CARE: Cancer Advocates, Researchers, and Clinicians Explore current treatments and clinical trials for breast cancer brain metastases
por: Natalie S. Joe, et al.
Publicado: (2021)