Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults
As of May 2021, over 286 million coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses have been administered across the country. This data is promising, however there are still populations that, despite availability, are declining vaccination. We reviewed vaccine likelihood and receptiveness to recommendation...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fa898394dd6e42be8a1e61066ead5fca |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fa898394dd6e42be8a1e61066ead5fca |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fa898394dd6e42be8a1e61066ead5fca2021-11-04T06:49:37ZAnalysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/fa898394dd6e42be8a1e61066ead5fca2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553079/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203As of May 2021, over 286 million coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses have been administered across the country. This data is promising, however there are still populations that, despite availability, are declining vaccination. We reviewed vaccine likelihood and receptiveness to recommendation from a doctor or nurse survey responses from 101,048 adults (≥18 years old) presenting to 442 primary care clinics in 8 states and the District of Columbia. Occupation was self-reported and demographic information extracted from the medical record, with 58.3% (n = 58,873) responding they were likely to receive the vaccine, 23.6% (n = 23,845) unlikely, and 18.1% (n = 18,330) uncertain. We found that essential workers were 18% less likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccination. Of those who indicated they were not already “very likely” to receive the vaccine, a recommendation from a nurse or doctor resulted in 16% of respondents becoming more likely to receive the vaccine, although certain occupations were less likely than others to be receptive to recommendations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to look at vaccine intent and receptiveness to recommendations from a doctor or nurse across specific essential worker occupations, and may help inform future early phase, vaccine rollouts and public health measure implementations.Tania ElliottBaligh R. YehiaAngela L. WinegarJyothi Karthik RajaAshlin JonesErin ShockleyJoseph CacchionePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Tania Elliott Baligh R. Yehia Angela L. Winegar Jyothi Karthik Raja Ashlin Jones Erin Shockley Joseph Cacchione Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults |
description |
As of May 2021, over 286 million coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses have been administered across the country. This data is promising, however there are still populations that, despite availability, are declining vaccination. We reviewed vaccine likelihood and receptiveness to recommendation from a doctor or nurse survey responses from 101,048 adults (≥18 years old) presenting to 442 primary care clinics in 8 states and the District of Columbia. Occupation was self-reported and demographic information extracted from the medical record, with 58.3% (n = 58,873) responding they were likely to receive the vaccine, 23.6% (n = 23,845) unlikely, and 18.1% (n = 18,330) uncertain. We found that essential workers were 18% less likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccination. Of those who indicated they were not already “very likely” to receive the vaccine, a recommendation from a nurse or doctor resulted in 16% of respondents becoming more likely to receive the vaccine, although certain occupations were less likely than others to be receptive to recommendations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to look at vaccine intent and receptiveness to recommendations from a doctor or nurse across specific essential worker occupations, and may help inform future early phase, vaccine rollouts and public health measure implementations. |
format |
article |
author |
Tania Elliott Baligh R. Yehia Angela L. Winegar Jyothi Karthik Raja Ashlin Jones Erin Shockley Joseph Cacchione |
author_facet |
Tania Elliott Baligh R. Yehia Angela L. Winegar Jyothi Karthik Raja Ashlin Jones Erin Shockley Joseph Cacchione |
author_sort |
Tania Elliott |
title |
Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults |
title_short |
Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults |
title_full |
Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 US adults |
title_sort |
analysis of covid-19 vaccine non-intent by essential vs non-essential worker, demographic, and socioeconomic status among 101,048 us adults |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fa898394dd6e42be8a1e61066ead5fca |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT taniaelliott analysisofcovid19vaccinenonintentbyessentialvsnonessentialworkerdemographicandsocioeconomicstatusamong101048usadults AT balighryehia analysisofcovid19vaccinenonintentbyessentialvsnonessentialworkerdemographicandsocioeconomicstatusamong101048usadults AT angelalwinegar analysisofcovid19vaccinenonintentbyessentialvsnonessentialworkerdemographicandsocioeconomicstatusamong101048usadults AT jyothikarthikraja analysisofcovid19vaccinenonintentbyessentialvsnonessentialworkerdemographicandsocioeconomicstatusamong101048usadults AT ashlinjones analysisofcovid19vaccinenonintentbyessentialvsnonessentialworkerdemographicandsocioeconomicstatusamong101048usadults AT erinshockley analysisofcovid19vaccinenonintentbyessentialvsnonessentialworkerdemographicandsocioeconomicstatusamong101048usadults AT josephcacchione analysisofcovid19vaccinenonintentbyessentialvsnonessentialworkerdemographicandsocioeconomicstatusamong101048usadults |
_version_ |
1718445128765407232 |