A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether medRxiv data availability statements describe open or closed data-that is, whether the data used in the study is openly available without restriction-and to examine if this changes on publication based on journal data-sharing policy. Additionally, t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Luke A McGuinness, Athena L Sheppard
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/fabd544b25b54c519c4d1037264389b7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:fabd544b25b54c519c4d1037264389b7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:fabd544b25b54c519c4d1037264389b72021-12-02T20:05:37ZA descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0250887https://doaj.org/article/fabd544b25b54c519c4d1037264389b72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250887https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether medRxiv data availability statements describe open or closed data-that is, whether the data used in the study is openly available without restriction-and to examine if this changes on publication based on journal data-sharing policy. Additionally, to examine whether data availability statements are sufficient to capture code availability declarations.<h4>Design</h4>Observational study, following a pre-registered protocol, of preprints posted on the medRxiv repository between 25th June 2019 and 1st May 2020 and their published counterparts.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Distribution of preprinted data availability statements across nine categories, determined by a prespecified classification system. Change in the percentage of data availability statements describing open data between the preprinted and published versions of the same record, stratified by journal sharing policy. Number of code availability declarations reported in the full-text preprint which were not captured in the corresponding data availability statement.<h4>Results</h4>3938 medRxiv preprints with an applicable data availability statement were included in our sample, of which 911 (23.1%) were categorized as describing open data. 379 (9.6%) preprints were subsequently published, and of these published articles, only 155 contained an applicable data availability statement. Similar to the preprint stage, a minority (59 (38.1%)) of these published data availability statements described open data. Of the 151 records eligible for the comparison between preprinted and published stages, 57 (37.7%) were published in journals which mandated open data sharing. Data availability statements more frequently described open data on publication when the journal mandated data sharing (open at preprint: 33.3%, open at publication: 61.4%) compared to when the journal did not mandate data sharing (open at preprint: 20.2%, open at publication: 22.3%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Requiring that authors submit a data availability statement is a good first step, but is insufficient to ensure data availability. Strict editorial policies that mandate data sharing (where appropriate) as a condition of publication appear to be effective in making research data available. We would strongly encourage all journal editors to examine whether their data availability policies are sufficiently stringent and consistently enforced.Luke A McGuinnessAthena L SheppardPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0250887 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Luke A McGuinness Athena L Sheppard A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.
description	<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether medRxiv data availability statements describe open or closed data-that is, whether the data used in the study is openly available without restriction-and to examine if this changes on publication based on journal data-sharing policy. Additionally, to examine whether data availability statements are sufficient to capture code availability declarations.<h4>Design</h4>Observational study, following a pre-registered protocol, of preprints posted on the medRxiv repository between 25th June 2019 and 1st May 2020 and their published counterparts.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Distribution of preprinted data availability statements across nine categories, determined by a prespecified classification system. Change in the percentage of data availability statements describing open data between the preprinted and published versions of the same record, stratified by journal sharing policy. Number of code availability declarations reported in the full-text preprint which were not captured in the corresponding data availability statement.<h4>Results</h4>3938 medRxiv preprints with an applicable data availability statement were included in our sample, of which 911 (23.1%) were categorized as describing open data. 379 (9.6%) preprints were subsequently published, and of these published articles, only 155 contained an applicable data availability statement. Similar to the preprint stage, a minority (59 (38.1%)) of these published data availability statements described open data. Of the 151 records eligible for the comparison between preprinted and published stages, 57 (37.7%) were published in journals which mandated open data sharing. Data availability statements more frequently described open data on publication when the journal mandated data sharing (open at preprint: 33.3%, open at publication: 61.4%) compared to when the journal did not mandate data sharing (open at preprint: 20.2%, open at publication: 22.3%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Requiring that authors submit a data availability statement is a good first step, but is insufficient to ensure data availability. Strict editorial policies that mandate data sharing (where appropriate) as a condition of publication appear to be effective in making research data available. We would strongly encourage all journal editors to examine whether their data availability policies are sufficiently stringent and consistently enforced.
format	article
author	Luke A McGuinness Athena L Sheppard
author_facet	Luke A McGuinness Athena L Sheppard
author_sort	Luke A McGuinness
title	A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.
title_short	A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.
title_full	A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.
title_fullStr	A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.
title_full_unstemmed	A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.
title_sort	descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medrxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/fabd544b25b54c519c4d1037264389b7
work_keys_str_mv	AT lukeamcguinness adescriptiveanalysisofthedataavailabilitystatementsaccompanyingmedrxivpreprintsandacomparisonwiththeirpublishedcounterparts AT athenalsheppard adescriptiveanalysisofthedataavailabilitystatementsaccompanyingmedrxivpreprintsandacomparisonwiththeirpublishedcounterparts AT lukeamcguinness descriptiveanalysisofthedataavailabilitystatementsaccompanyingmedrxivpreprintsandacomparisonwiththeirpublishedcounterparts AT athenalsheppard descriptiveanalysisofthedataavailabilitystatementsaccompanyingmedrxivpreprintsandacomparisonwiththeirpublishedcounterparts
_version_	1718375460949196800

A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts.

Ejemplares similares