Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds

Background: Physician participation in regularly scheduled series (RSS), also known as grand rounds, was explored with a particular focus on physician perceptions about the elements that affected their engagement in RSS and the unanticipated benefits to RSS. Methods: A qualitative study using se...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Adam Bass, Heather Armson, Kevin McLaughlin, Jocelyn Lockyer
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Canadian Medical Education Journal 2020
Materias:	Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/fac3852c1a9c4f8696cdefa4405a3895
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:fac3852c1a9c4f8696cdefa4405a3895
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:fac3852c1a9c4f8696cdefa4405a38952021-12-01T22:38:17ZPhysician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds10.36834/cmej.697501923-1202https://doaj.org/article/fac3852c1a9c4f8696cdefa4405a38952020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/69750https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202 Background: Physician participation in regularly scheduled series (RSS), also known as grand rounds, was explored with a particular focus on physician perceptions about the elements that affected their engagement in RSS and the unanticipated benefits to RSS. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis examined physicians’ perception of their knowledge and educational needs and the factors that contributed to engagement in their local hospital RSS. Results: Physician engagement in RSS was affected by four major themes: Features that Affect the RSS’ Quality; Collegial Interactions; Perceived Outcomes of RSS; and Barriers to participation in RSS. Features that Affect RSS’ Quality were specific modifiable features that impacted the perceived quality of the RSS. Collegial Interactions were interactions that occurred between colleagues directly or indirectly as a result of attending RSS. Outcomes of RSS were specific outcome measures used in RSS sessions. Barriers were seen as reasons why physicians were unwilling or unable to participate in RSS. All of the elements identified within the four themes contributed to the development of physician engagement. Physicians also identified changes directly and indirectly due to RSS. Discussion: Specific features of RSS result in enhanced physician engagement. There are benefits that may not be accounted for in continuing medical education (CME) outcome study designs Adam BassHeather ArmsonKevin McLaughlinJocelyn LockyerCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920 Adam Bass Heather Armson Kevin McLaughlin Jocelyn Lockyer Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds
description	Background: Physician participation in regularly scheduled series (RSS), also known as grand rounds, was explored with a particular focus on physician perceptions about the elements that affected their engagement in RSS and the unanticipated benefits to RSS. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis examined physicians’ perception of their knowledge and educational needs and the factors that contributed to engagement in their local hospital RSS. Results: Physician engagement in RSS was affected by four major themes: Features that Affect the RSS’ Quality; Collegial Interactions; Perceived Outcomes of RSS; and Barriers to participation in RSS. Features that Affect RSS’ Quality were specific modifiable features that impacted the perceived quality of the RSS. Collegial Interactions were interactions that occurred between colleagues directly or indirectly as a result of attending RSS. Outcomes of RSS were specific outcome measures used in RSS sessions. Barriers were seen as reasons why physicians were unwilling or unable to participate in RSS. All of the elements identified within the four themes contributed to the development of physician engagement. Physicians also identified changes directly and indirectly due to RSS. Discussion: Specific features of RSS result in enhanced physician engagement. There are benefits that may not be accounted for in continuing medical education (CME) outcome study designs
format	article
author	Adam Bass Heather Armson Kevin McLaughlin Jocelyn Lockyer
author_facet	Adam Bass Heather Armson Kevin McLaughlin Jocelyn Lockyer
author_sort	Adam Bass
title	Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds
title_short	Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds
title_full	Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds
title_fullStr	Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds
title_full_unstemmed	Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds
title_sort	physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds
publisher	Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/fac3852c1a9c4f8696cdefa4405a3895
work_keys_str_mv	AT adambass physicianengagementinregularlyscheduledrounds AT heatherarmson physicianengagementinregularlyscheduledrounds AT kevinmclaughlin physicianengagementinregularlyscheduledrounds AT jocelynlockyer physicianengagementinregularlyscheduledrounds
_version_	1718404138826465280

Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds

Ejemplares similares