Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.

<h4>Background</h4>Differences in morbidity and mortality between socioeconomic groups constitute one of the most consistent findings of epidemiologic research. However, research on social inequalities in health has yet to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlyin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvia Stringhini, Aline Dugravot, Martin Shipley, Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, Mika Kivimäki, Michael Marmot, Séverine Sabia, Archana Singh-Manoux
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fae7bdeceadb44f99cb8e2d94e4c499b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fae7bdeceadb44f99cb8e2d94e4c499b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fae7bdeceadb44f99cb8e2d94e4c499b2021-11-18T05:41:54ZHealth behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1000419https://doaj.org/article/fae7bdeceadb44f99cb8e2d94e4c499b2011-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21364974/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>Differences in morbidity and mortality between socioeconomic groups constitute one of the most consistent findings of epidemiologic research. However, research on social inequalities in health has yet to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this association. In recent analysis, we showed health behaviours, assessed longitudinally over the follow-up, to explain a major proportion of the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with mortality in the British Whitehall II study. However, whether health behaviours are equally important mediators of the SES-mortality association in different cultural settings remains unknown. In the present paper, we examine this issue in Whitehall II and another prospective European cohort, the French GAZEL study.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We included 9,771 participants from the Whitehall II study and 17,760 from the GAZEL study. Over the follow-up (mean 19.5 y in Whitehall II and 16.5 y in GAZEL), health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), were assessed longitudinally. Occupation (in the main analysis), education, and income (supplementary analysis) were the markers of SES. The socioeconomic gradient in smoking was greater (p<0.001) in Whitehall II (odds ratio [OR] = 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.11-4.36) than in GAZEL (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.49); this was also true for unhealthy diet (OR = 7.42, 95% CI 5.19-10.60 in Whitehall II and OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.49 in GAZEL, p<0.001). Socioeconomic differences in mortality were similar in the two cohorts, a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% CI 1.28-2.05) in Whitehall II and 1.94 in GAZEL (95% CI 1.58-2.39) for lowest versus highest occupational position. Health behaviours attenuated the association of SES with mortality by 75% (95% CI 44%-149%) in Whitehall II but only by 19% (95% CI 13%-29%) in GAZEL. Analysis using education and income yielded similar results.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Health behaviours were strong predictors of mortality in both cohorts but their association with SES was remarkably different. Thus, health behaviours are likely to be major contributors of socioeconomic differences in health only in contexts with a marked social characterisation of health behaviours. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.Silvia StringhiniAline DugravotMartin ShipleyMarcel GoldbergMarie ZinsMika KivimäkiMichael MarmotSéverine SabiaArchana Singh-ManouxPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 2, p e1000419 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Silvia Stringhini
Aline Dugravot
Martin Shipley
Marcel Goldberg
Marie Zins
Mika Kivimäki
Michael Marmot
Séverine Sabia
Archana Singh-Manoux
Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.
description <h4>Background</h4>Differences in morbidity and mortality between socioeconomic groups constitute one of the most consistent findings of epidemiologic research. However, research on social inequalities in health has yet to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this association. In recent analysis, we showed health behaviours, assessed longitudinally over the follow-up, to explain a major proportion of the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with mortality in the British Whitehall II study. However, whether health behaviours are equally important mediators of the SES-mortality association in different cultural settings remains unknown. In the present paper, we examine this issue in Whitehall II and another prospective European cohort, the French GAZEL study.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We included 9,771 participants from the Whitehall II study and 17,760 from the GAZEL study. Over the follow-up (mean 19.5 y in Whitehall II and 16.5 y in GAZEL), health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), were assessed longitudinally. Occupation (in the main analysis), education, and income (supplementary analysis) were the markers of SES. The socioeconomic gradient in smoking was greater (p<0.001) in Whitehall II (odds ratio [OR] = 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.11-4.36) than in GAZEL (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.49); this was also true for unhealthy diet (OR = 7.42, 95% CI 5.19-10.60 in Whitehall II and OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.49 in GAZEL, p<0.001). Socioeconomic differences in mortality were similar in the two cohorts, a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% CI 1.28-2.05) in Whitehall II and 1.94 in GAZEL (95% CI 1.58-2.39) for lowest versus highest occupational position. Health behaviours attenuated the association of SES with mortality by 75% (95% CI 44%-149%) in Whitehall II but only by 19% (95% CI 13%-29%) in GAZEL. Analysis using education and income yielded similar results.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Health behaviours were strong predictors of mortality in both cohorts but their association with SES was remarkably different. Thus, health behaviours are likely to be major contributors of socioeconomic differences in health only in contexts with a marked social characterisation of health behaviours. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
format article
author Silvia Stringhini
Aline Dugravot
Martin Shipley
Marcel Goldberg
Marie Zins
Mika Kivimäki
Michael Marmot
Séverine Sabia
Archana Singh-Manoux
author_facet Silvia Stringhini
Aline Dugravot
Martin Shipley
Marcel Goldberg
Marie Zins
Mika Kivimäki
Michael Marmot
Séverine Sabia
Archana Singh-Manoux
author_sort Silvia Stringhini
title Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.
title_short Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.
title_full Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.
title_fullStr Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.
title_full_unstemmed Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.
title_sort health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the british whitehall ii and the french gazel prospective cohorts.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/fae7bdeceadb44f99cb8e2d94e4c499b
work_keys_str_mv AT silviastringhini healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT alinedugravot healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT martinshipley healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT marcelgoldberg healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT mariezins healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT mikakivimaki healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT michaelmarmot healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT severinesabia healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
AT archanasinghmanoux healthbehaviourssocioeconomicstatusandmortalityfurtheranalysesofthebritishwhitehalliiandthefrenchgazelprospectivecohorts
_version_ 1718424889901187072