Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method

Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elisabet Rothenberg, Elisabeth Strandhagen, Jessica Samuelsson, Felicia Ahlner, Therese Rydberg Sterner, Ingmar Skoog, Christina E. Lundberg
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa2021-11-25T18:33:48ZRelative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method10.3390/nu131137542072-6643https://doaj.org/article/fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/11/3754https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6643Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns.Elisabet RothenbergElisabeth StrandhagenJessica SamuelssonFelicia AhlnerTherese Rydberg SternerIngmar SkoogChristina E. LundbergMDPI AGarticlediet historyfood frequency questionnairerelative validitydietary patterncardiovascular risk factorsscreening toolNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641ENNutrients, Vol 13, Iss 3754, p 3754 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic diet history
food frequency questionnaire
relative validity
dietary pattern
cardiovascular risk factors
screening tool
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
spellingShingle diet history
food frequency questionnaire
relative validity
dietary pattern
cardiovascular risk factors
screening tool
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Elisabet Rothenberg
Elisabeth Strandhagen
Jessica Samuelsson
Felicia Ahlner
Therese Rydberg Sterner
Ingmar Skoog
Christina E. Lundberg
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
description Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns.
format article
author Elisabet Rothenberg
Elisabeth Strandhagen
Jessica Samuelsson
Felicia Ahlner
Therese Rydberg Sterner
Ingmar Skoog
Christina E. Lundberg
author_facet Elisabet Rothenberg
Elisabeth Strandhagen
Jessica Samuelsson
Felicia Ahlner
Therese Rydberg Sterner
Ingmar Skoog
Christina E. Lundberg
author_sort Elisabet Rothenberg
title Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_short Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_full Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_fullStr Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_full_unstemmed Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_sort relative validity of a short 15-item food frequency questionnaire measuring dietary quality, by the diet history method
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabetrothenberg relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT elisabethstrandhagen relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT jessicasamuelsson relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT feliciaahlner relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT thereserydbergsterner relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT ingmarskoog relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT christinaelundberg relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
_version_ 1718410991733047296