Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa2021-11-25T18:33:48ZRelative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method10.3390/nu131137542072-6643https://doaj.org/article/fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/11/3754https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6643Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns.Elisabet RothenbergElisabeth StrandhagenJessica SamuelssonFelicia AhlnerTherese Rydberg SternerIngmar SkoogChristina E. LundbergMDPI AGarticlediet historyfood frequency questionnairerelative validitydietary patterncardiovascular risk factorsscreening toolNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641ENNutrients, Vol 13, Iss 3754, p 3754 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
diet history food frequency questionnaire relative validity dietary pattern cardiovascular risk factors screening tool Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 |
spellingShingle |
diet history food frequency questionnaire relative validity dietary pattern cardiovascular risk factors screening tool Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Elisabet Rothenberg Elisabeth Strandhagen Jessica Samuelsson Felicia Ahlner Therese Rydberg Sterner Ingmar Skoog Christina E. Lundberg Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
description |
Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns. |
format |
article |
author |
Elisabet Rothenberg Elisabeth Strandhagen Jessica Samuelsson Felicia Ahlner Therese Rydberg Sterner Ingmar Skoog Christina E. Lundberg |
author_facet |
Elisabet Rothenberg Elisabeth Strandhagen Jessica Samuelsson Felicia Ahlner Therese Rydberg Sterner Ingmar Skoog Christina E. Lundberg |
author_sort |
Elisabet Rothenberg |
title |
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_short |
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_full |
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_fullStr |
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_sort |
relative validity of a short 15-item food frequency questionnaire measuring dietary quality, by the diet history method |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fb2b62c37268438c9dc8fc0404e04faa |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elisabetrothenberg relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT elisabethstrandhagen relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT jessicasamuelsson relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT feliciaahlner relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT thereserydbergsterner relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT ingmarskoog relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT christinaelundberg relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod |
_version_ |
1718410991733047296 |