How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.

Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes ca...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helene Hoffmann, Christoph Baldow, Thomas Zerjatke, Andrea Gottschalk, Sebastian Wagner, Elena Karg, Sebastian Niehaus, Ingo Roeder, Ingmar Glauche, Nico Scherf
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb492021-12-02T20:13:10ZHow to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256585https://doaj.org/article/fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb492021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256585https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients.Helene HoffmannChristoph BaldowThomas ZerjatkeAndrea GottschalkSebastian WagnerElena KargSebastian NiehausIngo RoederIngmar GlaucheNico ScherfPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0256585 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Helene Hoffmann
Christoph Baldow
Thomas Zerjatke
Andrea Gottschalk
Sebastian Wagner
Elena Karg
Sebastian Niehaus
Ingo Roeder
Ingmar Glauche
Nico Scherf
How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.
description Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients.
format article
author Helene Hoffmann
Christoph Baldow
Thomas Zerjatke
Andrea Gottschalk
Sebastian Wagner
Elena Karg
Sebastian Niehaus
Ingo Roeder
Ingmar Glauche
Nico Scherf
author_facet Helene Hoffmann
Christoph Baldow
Thomas Zerjatke
Andrea Gottschalk
Sebastian Wagner
Elena Karg
Sebastian Niehaus
Ingo Roeder
Ingmar Glauche
Nico Scherf
author_sort Helene Hoffmann
title How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.
title_short How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.
title_full How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.
title_fullStr How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.
title_full_unstemmed How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.
title_sort how to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: a comparative in silico study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49
work_keys_str_mv AT helenehoffmann howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT christophbaldow howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT thomaszerjatke howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT andreagottschalk howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT sebastianwagner howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT elenakarg howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT sebastianniehaus howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT ingoroeder howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT ingmarglauche howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
AT nicoscherf howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy
_version_ 1718374861847396352