How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.
Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes ca...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb492021-12-02T20:13:10ZHow to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256585https://doaj.org/article/fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb492021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256585https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients.Helene HoffmannChristoph BaldowThomas ZerjatkeAndrea GottschalkSebastian WagnerElena KargSebastian NiehausIngo RoederIngmar GlaucheNico ScherfPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0256585 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Helene Hoffmann Christoph Baldow Thomas Zerjatke Andrea Gottschalk Sebastian Wagner Elena Karg Sebastian Niehaus Ingo Roeder Ingmar Glauche Nico Scherf How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study. |
description |
Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients. |
format |
article |
author |
Helene Hoffmann Christoph Baldow Thomas Zerjatke Andrea Gottschalk Sebastian Wagner Elena Karg Sebastian Niehaus Ingo Roeder Ingmar Glauche Nico Scherf |
author_facet |
Helene Hoffmann Christoph Baldow Thomas Zerjatke Andrea Gottschalk Sebastian Wagner Elena Karg Sebastian Niehaus Ingo Roeder Ingmar Glauche Nico Scherf |
author_sort |
Helene Hoffmann |
title |
How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study. |
title_short |
How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study. |
title_full |
How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study. |
title_fullStr |
How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study. |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study. |
title_sort |
how to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: a comparative in silico study. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT helenehoffmann howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT christophbaldow howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT thomaszerjatke howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT andreagottschalk howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT sebastianwagner howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT elenakarg howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT sebastianniehaus howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT ingoroeder howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT ingmarglauche howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy AT nicoscherf howtopredictrelapseinleukemiausingtimeseriesdataacomparativeinsilicostudy |
_version_ |
1718374861847396352 |