Collecting Validity Evidence: A Hands-on Workshop for Medical Education Assessment Instruments

Introduction There is an increasing call for developing validity evidence in medical education assessment. The literature lacks a practical resource regarding an actual development process. Our workshop teaches how to apply principles of validity evidence to existing assessment instruments and how t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caroline R. Paul, Michael S. Ryan, Gary L. Beck Dallaghan, Thanakorn Jirasevijinda, Patricia D. Quigley, Janice L. Hanson, Amal M. Khidir, Jean Petershack, Joseph Jackson, Linda Tewksbury, Mary Esther M. Rocha
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2019
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fb37938bf6a7466aaa0d9a887cf294b9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction There is an increasing call for developing validity evidence in medical education assessment. The literature lacks a practical resource regarding an actual development process. Our workshop teaches how to apply principles of validity evidence to existing assessment instruments and how to develop new instruments that will yield valid data. Methods The literature, consensus findings of curricula and content experts, and principles of adult learning guided the content and methodology of the workshop. The workshop underwent stringent peer review prior to presentation at one international and three national academic conferences. In the interactive workshop, selected domains of validity evidence were taught with sequential cycles of didactics, demonstration, and deliberate practice with facilitated feedback. An exercise guide steered participants through a stepwise approach. Using Likert-scale items and open-response questions, an evaluation form rated the workshop's effectiveness, captured details of how learners reached the objectives, and determined participants' plans for future work. Results The workshop demonstrated generalizability with successful implementation in diverse settings. Sixty-five learners, the majority being clinician-educators, completed evaluations. Learners rated the workshop favorably for each prompt. Qualitative comments corroborated the workshop's effectiveness. The active application and facilitated feedback components allowed learners to reflect in real time as to how they were meeting a particular objective. Discussion This feasible and practical educational intervention fills a literature gap by showing the medical educator how to apply validity evidence to both existing and in-development assessment instruments. Thus, it holds the potential to significantly impact learner and, subsequently, patient outcomes.