Adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector

Agricultural drought has put sub-Saharan African under significant pressure, and without adaptation, will negatively influence a future generation. Hence, it is crucial to assess the adaptation and coping strategies, the resilience of agricultural drought, its implication on the sustainability of th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yonas T. Bahta, Vuyiseka A. Myeki
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fb4a4b2e59d24c218636bb0d684fdf9e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fb4a4b2e59d24c218636bb0d684fdf9e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fb4a4b2e59d24c218636bb0d684fdf9e2021-12-02T05:02:24ZAdaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector2405-844010.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08280https://doaj.org/article/fb4a4b2e59d24c218636bb0d684fdf9e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021023835https://doaj.org/toc/2405-8440Agricultural drought has put sub-Saharan African under significant pressure, and without adaptation, will negatively influence a future generation. Hence, it is crucial to assess the adaptation and coping strategies, the resilience of agricultural drought, its implication on the sustainability of the livestock sector, and developing future interventions. Data of 217 smallholder livestock farmers were used in a principal component analysis to estimate the agricultural drought resilience index as an outcome variable against social wellbeing, economic outcome, environmental variable and adaptive capacity variables. The results found that 21% of the livestock farming households sold their livestock as an adaptation and coping strategy. In contrast, 20% of the farming households used alternative land use as an adaptation, and coping strategy, 20% stored food, 17% asked for animal feed, 6% sought employment, 6% migrated, 5% kept drought-tolerant breeds, 3% received relief grants, 2% used their savings and investments, and 1% leased their farms. When natural, economic and social sustainability was viewed as a resilience process, the three pillars positively and significantly impacted households' agricultural drought resilience. This implied that the more smallholder farmers participated in social networks and cooperatives, the higher the resilience to agricultural drought. Further, the more resources, income, access to land, access to water, access to credit, and additional types of farming, the higher the households’ resilience to agricultural drought and adaptive capacity. Thus, the three pillars of sustainability are crucial for enhancing the resilience and adaptability of smallholder livestock farmers. The study recommends that government aid reduce vulnerability to agricultural drought via access to agricultural credit and encourage farmers to be part of social networks and cooperatives. Additionally, the government could improve access to land and water rights to boost the resilience of smallholder farmers to agricultural drought. This could be achieved through collaboration and coordination among all role players.Yonas T. BahtaVuyiseka A. MyekiElsevierarticleSustainabilityResilienceAdaptationAgricultural droughtCoping strategySmallholder farmerScience (General)Q1-390Social sciences (General)H1-99ENHeliyon, Vol 7, Iss 11, Pp e08280- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Sustainability
Resilience
Adaptation
Agricultural drought
Coping strategy
Smallholder farmer
Science (General)
Q1-390
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle Sustainability
Resilience
Adaptation
Agricultural drought
Coping strategy
Smallholder farmer
Science (General)
Q1-390
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Yonas T. Bahta
Vuyiseka A. Myeki
Adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector
description Agricultural drought has put sub-Saharan African under significant pressure, and without adaptation, will negatively influence a future generation. Hence, it is crucial to assess the adaptation and coping strategies, the resilience of agricultural drought, its implication on the sustainability of the livestock sector, and developing future interventions. Data of 217 smallholder livestock farmers were used in a principal component analysis to estimate the agricultural drought resilience index as an outcome variable against social wellbeing, economic outcome, environmental variable and adaptive capacity variables. The results found that 21% of the livestock farming households sold their livestock as an adaptation and coping strategy. In contrast, 20% of the farming households used alternative land use as an adaptation, and coping strategy, 20% stored food, 17% asked for animal feed, 6% sought employment, 6% migrated, 5% kept drought-tolerant breeds, 3% received relief grants, 2% used their savings and investments, and 1% leased their farms. When natural, economic and social sustainability was viewed as a resilience process, the three pillars positively and significantly impacted households' agricultural drought resilience. This implied that the more smallholder farmers participated in social networks and cooperatives, the higher the resilience to agricultural drought. Further, the more resources, income, access to land, access to water, access to credit, and additional types of farming, the higher the households’ resilience to agricultural drought and adaptive capacity. Thus, the three pillars of sustainability are crucial for enhancing the resilience and adaptability of smallholder livestock farmers. The study recommends that government aid reduce vulnerability to agricultural drought via access to agricultural credit and encourage farmers to be part of social networks and cooperatives. Additionally, the government could improve access to land and water rights to boost the resilience of smallholder farmers to agricultural drought. This could be achieved through collaboration and coordination among all role players.
format article
author Yonas T. Bahta
Vuyiseka A. Myeki
author_facet Yonas T. Bahta
Vuyiseka A. Myeki
author_sort Yonas T. Bahta
title Adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector
title_short Adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector
title_full Adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector
title_fullStr Adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in South Africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector
title_sort adaptation, coping strategies and resilience of agricultural drought in south africa: implication for the sustainability of livestock sector
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fb4a4b2e59d24c218636bb0d684fdf9e
work_keys_str_mv AT yonastbahta adaptationcopingstrategiesandresilienceofagriculturaldroughtinsouthafricaimplicationforthesustainabilityoflivestocksector
AT vuyisekaamyeki adaptationcopingstrategiesandresilienceofagriculturaldroughtinsouthafricaimplicationforthesustainabilityoflivestocksector
_version_ 1718400808139096064