Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.

<h4>Background</h4>The VL elimination strategy requires cost-effective tools for case detection and management. This intervention study tests the yield, feasibility and cost of 4 different active case detection (ACD) strategies (camp, index case, incentive and blanket approach) in VL end...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shri Prakash Singh, Siddhivinayak Hirve, M Mamun Huda, Megha Raj Banjara, Narendra Kumar, Dinesh Mondal, Shyam Sundar, Pradeep Das, Chitra Kumar Gurung, Suman Rijal, C P Thakur, Beena Varghese, Axel Kroeger
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fb58860791b54b108e6f0af5128f1af6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fb58860791b54b108e6f0af5128f1af6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fb58860791b54b108e6f0af5128f1af62021-12-02T20:23:50ZOptions for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.1935-27271935-273510.1371/journal.pntd.0000960https://doaj.org/article/fb58860791b54b108e6f0af5128f1af62011-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21347452/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735<h4>Background</h4>The VL elimination strategy requires cost-effective tools for case detection and management. This intervention study tests the yield, feasibility and cost of 4 different active case detection (ACD) strategies (camp, index case, incentive and blanket approach) in VL endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>First, VL screening (fever more than 14 days, splenomegaly, rK39 test) was performed in camps. This was followed by house to house screening (blanket approach). An analysis of secondary VL cases in the neighborhood of index cases was simulated (index case approach). A second screening round was repeated 4-6 months later. In another sub-district in India and Nepal, health workers received incentives for detecting new VL cases over a 4 month period (incentive approach). This was followed by house screening for undetected cases. A total of 28 new VL cases were identified by blanket approach in the 1(st) screening round, and used as ACD gold standard. Of these, the camp approach identified 22 (sensitivity 78.6%), index case approach identified 12 (sensitivity--42.9%), and incentive approach identified 23 new VL cases out of 29 cases detected by the house screening (sensitivity--79.3%). The effort required to detect a new VL case varied (blanket approach--1092 households, incentive approach--978 households; index case approach--788 households had to be screened). The cost per new case detected varied (camp approach $21 - $661; index case approach $149 - $200; incentive based approach $50 - $543; blanket screening $112 - $629). The 2(nd) screening round yielded 20 new VL cases. Sixty and nine new PKDL cases were detected in the first and second round respectively.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>ACD in the VL elimination campaign has a high yield of new cases at programme costs which vary according to the screening method chosen. Countries need the right mix of approaches according to the epidemiological profile, affordability and organizational feasibility.Shri Prakash SinghSiddhivinayak HirveM Mamun HudaMegha Raj BanjaraNarendra KumarDinesh MondalShyam SundarPradeep DasChitra Kumar GurungSuman RijalC P ThakurBeena VargheseAxel KroegerPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleArctic medicine. Tropical medicineRC955-962Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 5, Iss 2, p e960 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Shri Prakash Singh
Siddhivinayak Hirve
M Mamun Huda
Megha Raj Banjara
Narendra Kumar
Dinesh Mondal
Shyam Sundar
Pradeep Das
Chitra Kumar Gurung
Suman Rijal
C P Thakur
Beena Varghese
Axel Kroeger
Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.
description <h4>Background</h4>The VL elimination strategy requires cost-effective tools for case detection and management. This intervention study tests the yield, feasibility and cost of 4 different active case detection (ACD) strategies (camp, index case, incentive and blanket approach) in VL endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>First, VL screening (fever more than 14 days, splenomegaly, rK39 test) was performed in camps. This was followed by house to house screening (blanket approach). An analysis of secondary VL cases in the neighborhood of index cases was simulated (index case approach). A second screening round was repeated 4-6 months later. In another sub-district in India and Nepal, health workers received incentives for detecting new VL cases over a 4 month period (incentive approach). This was followed by house screening for undetected cases. A total of 28 new VL cases were identified by blanket approach in the 1(st) screening round, and used as ACD gold standard. Of these, the camp approach identified 22 (sensitivity 78.6%), index case approach identified 12 (sensitivity--42.9%), and incentive approach identified 23 new VL cases out of 29 cases detected by the house screening (sensitivity--79.3%). The effort required to detect a new VL case varied (blanket approach--1092 households, incentive approach--978 households; index case approach--788 households had to be screened). The cost per new case detected varied (camp approach $21 - $661; index case approach $149 - $200; incentive based approach $50 - $543; blanket screening $112 - $629). The 2(nd) screening round yielded 20 new VL cases. Sixty and nine new PKDL cases were detected in the first and second round respectively.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>ACD in the VL elimination campaign has a high yield of new cases at programme costs which vary according to the screening method chosen. Countries need the right mix of approaches according to the epidemiological profile, affordability and organizational feasibility.
format article
author Shri Prakash Singh
Siddhivinayak Hirve
M Mamun Huda
Megha Raj Banjara
Narendra Kumar
Dinesh Mondal
Shyam Sundar
Pradeep Das
Chitra Kumar Gurung
Suman Rijal
C P Thakur
Beena Varghese
Axel Kroeger
author_facet Shri Prakash Singh
Siddhivinayak Hirve
M Mamun Huda
Megha Raj Banjara
Narendra Kumar
Dinesh Mondal
Shyam Sundar
Pradeep Das
Chitra Kumar Gurung
Suman Rijal
C P Thakur
Beena Varghese
Axel Kroeger
author_sort Shri Prakash Singh
title Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.
title_short Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.
title_full Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.
title_fullStr Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.
title_full_unstemmed Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.
title_sort options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of india, nepal and bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/fb58860791b54b108e6f0af5128f1af6
work_keys_str_mv AT shriprakashsingh optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT siddhivinayakhirve optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT mmamunhuda optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT megharajbanjara optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT narendrakumar optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT dineshmondal optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT shyamsundar optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT pradeepdas optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT chitrakumargurung optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT sumanrijal optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT cpthakur optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT beenavarghese optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT axelkroeger optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
_version_ 1718374144978976768