What are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?

Small group discussion (SGD) is a well-known educational method to promote active learning. Best practices for running SGDs in face-to-face events are described in the literature; however, little has been reported regarding synchronous online delivery. The aim of this study was to determine learner...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nele Roels, Monica Ghidinelli, Michael Cunningham, Murat Bilici
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
cme
cpd
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fb6e3ec9def0425991be9bf7aedb5429
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fb6e3ec9def0425991be9bf7aedb5429
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fb6e3ec9def0425991be9bf7aedb54292021-11-26T11:19:49ZWhat are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?2161-408310.1080/21614083.2021.1993429https://doaj.org/article/fb6e3ec9def0425991be9bf7aedb54292021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1993429https://doaj.org/toc/2161-4083Small group discussion (SGD) is a well-known educational method to promote active learning. Best practices for running SGDs in face-to-face events are described in the literature; however, little has been reported regarding synchronous online delivery. The aim of this study was to determine learner and instructor preferences for online SGDs in terms of group size and composition and to formulate best practices based on participant and faculty feedback. We designed an 8-module online course for surgeons managing upper extremity trauma. Participants were pre-assigned into 2 types of group: 1 faculty with 5 participants or 2 faculty with 8 participants. We collected feedback from 91 participants and 34 faculty over the 8 weeks in multiple ways. Participants preferred way to run an online SGD is to have 2 faculty with 4–5 participants (80%), rotating to different faculty every week (67%), and interacting with peers from different countries (95%). Pre-course assessment questions and pre-recorded presentations enhanced the online discussions for 82%. From open text comments, we identified that cases/content, faculty, participant engagement, and technical support worked well. The course could be improved by adding more extensive technical and connectivity checks, having a different time scheduling, and integrating more supporting materials.Nele RoelsMonica GhidinelliMichael CunninghamMurat BiliciTaylor & Francis Grouparticleonline small group discussiononline educationcmecpdonline case discussionsurgery educationSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Medicine (General)R5-920ENJournal of European CME, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic online small group discussion
online education
cme
cpd
online case discussion
surgery education
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle online small group discussion
online education
cme
cpd
online case discussion
surgery education
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Nele Roels
Monica Ghidinelli
Michael Cunningham
Murat Bilici
What are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?
description Small group discussion (SGD) is a well-known educational method to promote active learning. Best practices for running SGDs in face-to-face events are described in the literature; however, little has been reported regarding synchronous online delivery. The aim of this study was to determine learner and instructor preferences for online SGDs in terms of group size and composition and to formulate best practices based on participant and faculty feedback. We designed an 8-module online course for surgeons managing upper extremity trauma. Participants were pre-assigned into 2 types of group: 1 faculty with 5 participants or 2 faculty with 8 participants. We collected feedback from 91 participants and 34 faculty over the 8 weeks in multiple ways. Participants preferred way to run an online SGD is to have 2 faculty with 4–5 participants (80%), rotating to different faculty every week (67%), and interacting with peers from different countries (95%). Pre-course assessment questions and pre-recorded presentations enhanced the online discussions for 82%. From open text comments, we identified that cases/content, faculty, participant engagement, and technical support worked well. The course could be improved by adding more extensive technical and connectivity checks, having a different time scheduling, and integrating more supporting materials.
format article
author Nele Roels
Monica Ghidinelli
Michael Cunningham
Murat Bilici
author_facet Nele Roels
Monica Ghidinelli
Michael Cunningham
Murat Bilici
author_sort Nele Roels
title What are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?
title_short What are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?
title_full What are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?
title_fullStr What are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?
title_full_unstemmed What are Learner and Instructor Preferences for Group Size and Composition for a Series of Synchronous Online Case Discussions for Upper Extremity Trauma Surgeons?
title_sort what are learner and instructor preferences for group size and composition for a series of synchronous online case discussions for upper extremity trauma surgeons?
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fb6e3ec9def0425991be9bf7aedb5429
work_keys_str_mv AT neleroels whatarelearnerandinstructorpreferencesforgroupsizeandcompositionforaseriesofsynchronousonlinecasediscussionsforupperextremitytraumasurgeons
AT monicaghidinelli whatarelearnerandinstructorpreferencesforgroupsizeandcompositionforaseriesofsynchronousonlinecasediscussionsforupperextremitytraumasurgeons
AT michaelcunningham whatarelearnerandinstructorpreferencesforgroupsizeandcompositionforaseriesofsynchronousonlinecasediscussionsforupperextremitytraumasurgeons
AT muratbilici whatarelearnerandinstructorpreferencesforgroupsizeandcompositionforaseriesofsynchronousonlinecasediscussionsforupperextremitytraumasurgeons
_version_ 1718409510797705216