Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)

Introduction: The purpose of the study was to scientifically test maxillary canine retraction assisted by miniscrew implant with corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients (six males, nine females) who had Class II division malocclusion with enhanced overjet were i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Saurav Kumar, Gaurav Verma, Nadira Hassan, Sana Shaikh, Bharti Anand, Ravi Anjan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	canine retraction corticotomy implants malocclusion Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/fb913e63ba184c1da9ad76bf30729c62
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:fb913e63ba184c1da9ad76bf30729c62
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:fb913e63ba184c1da9ad76bf30729c622021-11-19T12:15:52ZMiniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_106_21https://doaj.org/article/fb913e63ba184c1da9ad76bf30729c622021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1286;epage=1290;aulast=Kumarhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Introduction: The purpose of the study was to scientifically test maxillary canine retraction assisted by miniscrew implant with corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients (six males, nine females) who had Class II division malocclusion with enhanced overjet were included in the study. Maxillary first premolars were surgical displaced along with retraction of maxillary. In the canine-premolar region, corticotomy was performed on one side of the maxillary arch; the other side served as the control region. Over a 4-month follow-up span, the following variables were examined: plaque index, tooth movement intensity, attachment degree, gingival regression, molar anchorage failure, gingival index, and scope of testing. Results: After 2 months, the canine retraction rate on the corticotomy side was more significant than on the control side by twice. The tooth movement rate steadily decreased to 1.6 times faster at the end of the 3rd month and to 1.06 times faster at the end of the 4th month. No failure of molar anchorage occurred on either the controlled or nonoperated hand during canine retraction. Conclusions: For people requiring orthodontic care with shortened treatment periods, corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics may be a viable treatment modality.Saurav KumarGaurav VermaNadira HassanSana ShaikhBharti AnandRavi AnjanWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecanine retractioncorticotomyimplantsmalocclusionPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1286-1290 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	canine retraction corticotomy implants malocclusion Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	canine retraction corticotomy implants malocclusion Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Saurav Kumar Gaurav Verma Nadira Hassan Sana Shaikh Bharti Anand Ravi Anjan Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)
description	Introduction: The purpose of the study was to scientifically test maxillary canine retraction assisted by miniscrew implant with corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients (six males, nine females) who had Class II division malocclusion with enhanced overjet were included in the study. Maxillary first premolars were surgical displaced along with retraction of maxillary. In the canine-premolar region, corticotomy was performed on one side of the maxillary arch; the other side served as the control region. Over a 4-month follow-up span, the following variables were examined: plaque index, tooth movement intensity, attachment degree, gingival regression, molar anchorage failure, gingival index, and scope of testing. Results: After 2 months, the canine retraction rate on the corticotomy side was more significant than on the control side by twice. The tooth movement rate steadily decreased to 1.6 times faster at the end of the 3rd month and to 1.06 times faster at the end of the 4th month. No failure of molar anchorage occurred on either the controlled or nonoperated hand during canine retraction. Conclusions: For people requiring orthodontic care with shortened treatment periods, corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics may be a viable treatment modality.
format	article
author	Saurav Kumar Gaurav Verma Nadira Hassan Sana Shaikh Bharti Anand Ravi Anjan
author_facet	Saurav Kumar Gaurav Verma Nadira Hassan Sana Shaikh Bharti Anand Ravi Anjan
author_sort	Saurav Kumar
title	Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)
title_short	Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)
title_full	Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)
title_fullStr	Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)
title_full_unstemmed	Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)
title_sort	miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy facilitated orthodontics (cfo)
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/fb913e63ba184c1da9ad76bf30729c62
work_keys_str_mv	AT sauravkumar miniscrewimplantsupportedmaxillarycanineretractionwithandwithoutcorticotomyfacilitatedorthodonticscfo AT gauravverma miniscrewimplantsupportedmaxillarycanineretractionwithandwithoutcorticotomyfacilitatedorthodonticscfo AT nadirahassan miniscrewimplantsupportedmaxillarycanineretractionwithandwithoutcorticotomyfacilitatedorthodonticscfo AT sanashaikh miniscrewimplantsupportedmaxillarycanineretractionwithandwithoutcorticotomyfacilitatedorthodonticscfo AT bhartianand miniscrewimplantsupportedmaxillarycanineretractionwithandwithoutcorticotomyfacilitatedorthodonticscfo AT ravianjan miniscrewimplantsupportedmaxillarycanineretractionwithandwithoutcorticotomyfacilitatedorthodonticscfo
_version_	1718420171627954176

Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)

Ejemplares similares