Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy
Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fbd740828d5841df9c70ca2967098239 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fbd740828d5841df9c70ca2967098239 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fbd740828d5841df9c70ca29670982392021-11-21T02:04:14ZDosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy1533-033810.1177/15330338211060170https://doaj.org/article/fbd740828d5841df9c70ca29670982392021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1177/15330338211060170https://doaj.org/toc/1533-0338Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted a planning study of WBRT for 10 patients. The clinical target volume was defined as the whole brain excluding the hippocampus avoidance (HA) region. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions to cover 95% of the target. Constraint goals were defined for the target and organs at risk (OAR). Results: Both techniques met the dose constraints for the target and OAR. However, the coverage of the target (dose covering 95% [D95%] and 98% [D98%] of the volume) were better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: D95%, 29.9 Gy vs 30.0 Gy, P < .001; D98%, 26.7 Gy vs 28.1 Gy, P = .002). The homogeneity and conformity of the target were also better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: homogeneity index, 1.50 vs 1.28, P < .001; conformity index, 1.30 vs 1.14, P < .001). IMPT reduced the D100% of the hippocampus by 59% (HT vs IMPT: 9.3 Gy vs 3.8 Gy, P < .001) and reduced the Dmean of the hippocampus by 37% (HT vs IMPT: 11.1 Gy vs 7.0 Gy, P < .001) compared with HT. The scalp IMPT reduced the percentage of the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy) and V10Gy compared with HT (HT vs IMPT: V20Gy, 56.7% vs 6.6%, P < .001; V10Gy, 90.5% vs 37.1%, P < .001). Conclusion: Both techniques provided acceptable target dose coverage. Especially, IMPT achieved excellent hippocampus- and scalp-sparing. HA-WBRT using IMPT is a promising treatment to prevent cognitive decline and alopecia.Taiki Takaoka MD, PhDNatsuo Tomita MD, PhDTomoki Mizuno MDShingo Hashimoto MD, PhDTakahiro Tsuchiya RTTMasashi Tomida RTTTakeshi Yanagi MD, PhDSAGE PublishingarticleNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENTechnology in Cancer Research & Treatment, Vol 20 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 |
spellingShingle |
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 Taiki Takaoka MD, PhD Natsuo Tomita MD, PhD Tomoki Mizuno MD Shingo Hashimoto MD, PhD Takahiro Tsuchiya RTT Masashi Tomida RTT Takeshi Yanagi MD, PhD Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
description |
Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted a planning study of WBRT for 10 patients. The clinical target volume was defined as the whole brain excluding the hippocampus avoidance (HA) region. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions to cover 95% of the target. Constraint goals were defined for the target and organs at risk (OAR). Results: Both techniques met the dose constraints for the target and OAR. However, the coverage of the target (dose covering 95% [D95%] and 98% [D98%] of the volume) were better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: D95%, 29.9 Gy vs 30.0 Gy, P < .001; D98%, 26.7 Gy vs 28.1 Gy, P = .002). The homogeneity and conformity of the target were also better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: homogeneity index, 1.50 vs 1.28, P < .001; conformity index, 1.30 vs 1.14, P < .001). IMPT reduced the D100% of the hippocampus by 59% (HT vs IMPT: 9.3 Gy vs 3.8 Gy, P < .001) and reduced the Dmean of the hippocampus by 37% (HT vs IMPT: 11.1 Gy vs 7.0 Gy, P < .001) compared with HT. The scalp IMPT reduced the percentage of the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy) and V10Gy compared with HT (HT vs IMPT: V20Gy, 56.7% vs 6.6%, P < .001; V10Gy, 90.5% vs 37.1%, P < .001). Conclusion: Both techniques provided acceptable target dose coverage. Especially, IMPT achieved excellent hippocampus- and scalp-sparing. HA-WBRT using IMPT is a promising treatment to prevent cognitive decline and alopecia. |
format |
article |
author |
Taiki Takaoka MD, PhD Natsuo Tomita MD, PhD Tomoki Mizuno MD Shingo Hashimoto MD, PhD Takahiro Tsuchiya RTT Masashi Tomida RTT Takeshi Yanagi MD, PhD |
author_facet |
Taiki Takaoka MD, PhD Natsuo Tomita MD, PhD Tomoki Mizuno MD Shingo Hashimoto MD, PhD Takahiro Tsuchiya RTT Masashi Tomida RTT Takeshi Yanagi MD, PhD |
author_sort |
Taiki Takaoka MD, PhD |
title |
Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
title_short |
Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
title_full |
Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
title_fullStr |
Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
title_sort |
dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy in hippocampus- and scalp-sparing whole brain radiotherapy |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fbd740828d5841df9c70ca2967098239 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT taikitakaokamdphd dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy AT natsuotomitamdphd dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy AT tomokimizunomd dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy AT shingohashimotomdphd dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy AT takahirotsuchiyartt dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy AT masashitomidartt dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy AT takeshiyanagimdphd dosimetriccomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandintensitymodulatedprotontherapyinhippocampusandscalpsparingwholebrainradiotherapy |
_version_ |
1718419401306275840 |