Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data

Abstract The present work focuses on the analysis of the scaling features of electron density fluctuations in the mid- and high-latitude topside ionosphere under different conditions of geomagnetic activity. The aim is to understand whether it is possible to identify a proxy that may provide informa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paola De Michelis, Giuseppe Consolini, Alessio Pignalberi, Roberta Tozzi, Igino Coco, Fabio Giannattasio, Michael Pezzopane, Georgios Balasis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fbe55ddc5967445cbfbfa0ff23786b57
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fbe55ddc5967445cbfbfa0ff23786b57
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fbe55ddc5967445cbfbfa0ff23786b572021-12-02T16:31:17ZLooking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data10.1038/s41598-021-84985-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/fbe55ddc5967445cbfbfa0ff23786b572021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84985-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The present work focuses on the analysis of the scaling features of electron density fluctuations in the mid- and high-latitude topside ionosphere under different conditions of geomagnetic activity. The aim is to understand whether it is possible to identify a proxy that may provide information on the properties of electron density fluctuations and on the possible physical mechanisms at their origin, as for instance, turbulence phenomena. So, we selected about 4 years (April 2014–February 2018) of 1 Hz electron density measurements recorded on-board ESA Swarm A satellite. Using the Auroral Electrojet (AE) index, we identified two different geomagnetic conditions: quiet (AE < 50 nT) and active (AE > 300 nT). For both datasets, we evaluated the first- and second-order scaling exponents and an intermittency coefficient associated with the electron density fluctuations. Then, the joint probability distribution between each of these quantities and the rate of change of electron density index was also evaluated. We identified two families of plasma density fluctuations characterized by different mean values of both the scaling exponents and the considered ionospheric index, suggesting that different mechanisms (instabilities/turbulent processes) can be responsible for the observed scaling features. Furthermore, a clear different localization of the two families in the magnetic latitude—magnetic local time plane is found and its dependence on geomagnetic activity levels is analyzed. These results may well have a bearing about the capability of recognizing the turbulent character of irregularities using a typical ionospheric plasma irregularity index as a proxy.Paola De MichelisGiuseppe ConsoliniAlessio PignalberiRoberta TozziIgino CocoFabio GiannattasioMichael PezzopaneGeorgios BalasisNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Paola De Michelis
Giuseppe Consolini
Alessio Pignalberi
Roberta Tozzi
Igino Coco
Fabio Giannattasio
Michael Pezzopane
Georgios Balasis
Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data
description Abstract The present work focuses on the analysis of the scaling features of electron density fluctuations in the mid- and high-latitude topside ionosphere under different conditions of geomagnetic activity. The aim is to understand whether it is possible to identify a proxy that may provide information on the properties of electron density fluctuations and on the possible physical mechanisms at their origin, as for instance, turbulence phenomena. So, we selected about 4 years (April 2014–February 2018) of 1 Hz electron density measurements recorded on-board ESA Swarm A satellite. Using the Auroral Electrojet (AE) index, we identified two different geomagnetic conditions: quiet (AE < 50 nT) and active (AE > 300 nT). For both datasets, we evaluated the first- and second-order scaling exponents and an intermittency coefficient associated with the electron density fluctuations. Then, the joint probability distribution between each of these quantities and the rate of change of electron density index was also evaluated. We identified two families of plasma density fluctuations characterized by different mean values of both the scaling exponents and the considered ionospheric index, suggesting that different mechanisms (instabilities/turbulent processes) can be responsible for the observed scaling features. Furthermore, a clear different localization of the two families in the magnetic latitude—magnetic local time plane is found and its dependence on geomagnetic activity levels is analyzed. These results may well have a bearing about the capability of recognizing the turbulent character of irregularities using a typical ionospheric plasma irregularity index as a proxy.
format article
author Paola De Michelis
Giuseppe Consolini
Alessio Pignalberi
Roberta Tozzi
Igino Coco
Fabio Giannattasio
Michael Pezzopane
Georgios Balasis
author_facet Paola De Michelis
Giuseppe Consolini
Alessio Pignalberi
Roberta Tozzi
Igino Coco
Fabio Giannattasio
Michael Pezzopane
Georgios Balasis
author_sort Paola De Michelis
title Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data
title_short Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data
title_full Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data
title_fullStr Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data
title_full_unstemmed Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data
title_sort looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with swarm data
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fbe55ddc5967445cbfbfa0ff23786b57
work_keys_str_mv AT paolademichelis lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
AT giuseppeconsolini lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
AT alessiopignalberi lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
AT robertatozzi lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
AT iginococo lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
AT fabiogiannattasio lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
AT michaelpezzopane lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
AT georgiosbalasis lookingforaproxyoftheionosphericturbulencewithswarmdata
_version_ 1718383910889455616