Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods

Grain yield stability measurements under varied environmental conditions suggests selection of suitable genotype. Safflower genotypes having different origins were tested for G x E effects on yield using univariate and multivariate statistics in six test environments (three varied climate conditions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obaid Afzal, Fayyaz-ul Hassan, Mukhtar Ahmed, Ghulam Shabbir, Shakeel Ahmed
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fbf50a7604cb43b596d9ca543c886b1e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fbf50a7604cb43b596d9ca543c886b1e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fbf50a7604cb43b596d9ca543c886b1e2021-12-02T05:03:41ZDetermination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods2666-154310.1016/j.jafr.2021.100233https://doaj.org/article/fbf50a7604cb43b596d9ca543c886b1e2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154321001356https://doaj.org/toc/2666-1543Grain yield stability measurements under varied environmental conditions suggests selection of suitable genotype. Safflower genotypes having different origins were tested for G x E effects on yield using univariate and multivariate statistics in six test environments (three varied climate conditions and combination of years) during 2016–17 and 2017–18. Genotypes were classified as stable or unstable based on multiple stability measures. Comparative yield results reveals different genotypic grain yield response in each environment. High yield (1618.4 kg ha−1) performance and responsiveness of PI-16308 genotype to favorable environment and lowest 1419 kg ha−1 was observed for PI-26748. In lieu of varied climatic condition Env4 showed 37% extra grain yield compared to Env3.The PCA results placed Env1, Env3 and Env5 in one group for producing similar grain yield and rest of the environments showed highest variation. Results of parametric (S2di) and non-parametric (S⁽3), S⁽⁶⁾, NP⁽1⁾, NP⁽2⁾, NP⁽3⁾ & NP⁽⁴⁾) measures indicates that PI-16308 and PI-16315 can be used to improve stability. However, Wricke's ecovalence (Wi2), Shukla's stability variance (σi2), θi, θ(i), S⁽1⁾ and S⁽2⁾ could be considered for improving grain yield of PI-26748 genotype.Obaid AfzalFayyaz-ul HassanMukhtar AhmedGhulam ShabbirShakeel AhmedElsevierarticleSafflowerAdaptabilityStability measuresGenotype x environment interactionAgriculture (General)S1-972Nutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641ENJournal of Agriculture and Food Research, Vol 6, Iss , Pp 100233- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Safflower
Adaptability
Stability measures
Genotype x environment interaction
Agriculture (General)
S1-972
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
spellingShingle Safflower
Adaptability
Stability measures
Genotype x environment interaction
Agriculture (General)
S1-972
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Obaid Afzal
Fayyaz-ul Hassan
Mukhtar Ahmed
Ghulam Shabbir
Shakeel Ahmed
Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods
description Grain yield stability measurements under varied environmental conditions suggests selection of suitable genotype. Safflower genotypes having different origins were tested for G x E effects on yield using univariate and multivariate statistics in six test environments (three varied climate conditions and combination of years) during 2016–17 and 2017–18. Genotypes were classified as stable or unstable based on multiple stability measures. Comparative yield results reveals different genotypic grain yield response in each environment. High yield (1618.4 kg ha−1) performance and responsiveness of PI-16308 genotype to favorable environment and lowest 1419 kg ha−1 was observed for PI-26748. In lieu of varied climatic condition Env4 showed 37% extra grain yield compared to Env3.The PCA results placed Env1, Env3 and Env5 in one group for producing similar grain yield and rest of the environments showed highest variation. Results of parametric (S2di) and non-parametric (S⁽3), S⁽⁶⁾, NP⁽1⁾, NP⁽2⁾, NP⁽3⁾ & NP⁽⁴⁾) measures indicates that PI-16308 and PI-16315 can be used to improve stability. However, Wricke's ecovalence (Wi2), Shukla's stability variance (σi2), θi, θ(i), S⁽1⁾ and S⁽2⁾ could be considered for improving grain yield of PI-26748 genotype.
format article
author Obaid Afzal
Fayyaz-ul Hassan
Mukhtar Ahmed
Ghulam Shabbir
Shakeel Ahmed
author_facet Obaid Afzal
Fayyaz-ul Hassan
Mukhtar Ahmed
Ghulam Shabbir
Shakeel Ahmed
author_sort Obaid Afzal
title Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods
title_short Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods
title_full Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods
title_fullStr Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods
title_full_unstemmed Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods
title_sort determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fbf50a7604cb43b596d9ca543c886b1e
work_keys_str_mv AT obaidafzal determinationofstablesafflowergenotypesinvariableenvironmentsbyparametricandnonparametricmethods
AT fayyazulhassan determinationofstablesafflowergenotypesinvariableenvironmentsbyparametricandnonparametricmethods
AT mukhtarahmed determinationofstablesafflowergenotypesinvariableenvironmentsbyparametricandnonparametricmethods
AT ghulamshabbir determinationofstablesafflowergenotypesinvariableenvironmentsbyparametricandnonparametricmethods
AT shakeelahmed determinationofstablesafflowergenotypesinvariableenvironmentsbyparametricandnonparametricmethods
_version_ 1718400689846091776