Pressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis

Preview: 2020, the year the coronavirus pandemic spread globally, marked the twenty-fifth year since the publication of Pierre Hadot’s work Philosophy as a Way of Life (translated by co-author Michael Chase). In that time, what began as the research specialization of just a few scholars has become a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthew Sharpe, Eli Kramer, Michael Chase
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University of Warsaw 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fc0abfdc5e0743a5ba90dc6f30ee3753
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fc0abfdc5e0743a5ba90dc6f30ee3753
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fc0abfdc5e0743a5ba90dc6f30ee37532021-11-26T20:47:30ZPressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis10.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.00132544-302Xhttps://doaj.org/article/fc0abfdc5e0743a5ba90dc6f30ee37532021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eidos.uw.edu.pl/pressing-questions-for-the-philosophical-life-in-a-time-of-crisis/https://doaj.org/toc/2544-302XPreview: 2020, the year the coronavirus pandemic spread globally, marked the twenty-fifth year since the publication of Pierre Hadot’s work Philosophy as a Way of Life (translated by co-author Michael Chase). In that time, what began as the research specialization of just a few scholars has become a growing area of philosophical and metaphilosophical inquiry, bringing together researchers from around the globe. Hadot’s key ideas of spiritual exercises, and the very idea of PWL, have been applied to a host of individual thinkers from across the history of philosophy: from the Hellenistic and Roman-era philosophers of direct concern to Hadot, through renaissance thinkers like Petrarch, Lipsius, Montaigne, Descartes, or Bacon, into nineteenth-century thinkers led by Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche.In more recent years, more global reflections on the “very idea” of PWL have begun to emerge, as well as dedicated journal editions. In these more recent PWL studies, some of the manifold research questions have begun to be explored, which were opened up by the studies of Pierre and Ilsetraut Hadot, as well as its reception in Michel Foucault’s later work. What implications, after all, does understanding the history of PWL, and the predominance of this metaphilosophical conception in the history of Western thought, have for how we understand the practice(s) of philosophy today? Does recovering the alternative understandings of philosophy as a practice in history necessarily lead to a criticism of contemporary, solely academic or theoretical modes of philosophizing, or is the idea of PWL one which has only historiographical force?Matthew SharpeEli KramerMichael ChaseUniversity of WarsawarticlePhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENEidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Matthew Sharpe
Eli Kramer
Michael Chase
Pressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis
description Preview: 2020, the year the coronavirus pandemic spread globally, marked the twenty-fifth year since the publication of Pierre Hadot’s work Philosophy as a Way of Life (translated by co-author Michael Chase). In that time, what began as the research specialization of just a few scholars has become a growing area of philosophical and metaphilosophical inquiry, bringing together researchers from around the globe. Hadot’s key ideas of spiritual exercises, and the very idea of PWL, have been applied to a host of individual thinkers from across the history of philosophy: from the Hellenistic and Roman-era philosophers of direct concern to Hadot, through renaissance thinkers like Petrarch, Lipsius, Montaigne, Descartes, or Bacon, into nineteenth-century thinkers led by Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche.In more recent years, more global reflections on the “very idea” of PWL have begun to emerge, as well as dedicated journal editions. In these more recent PWL studies, some of the manifold research questions have begun to be explored, which were opened up by the studies of Pierre and Ilsetraut Hadot, as well as its reception in Michel Foucault’s later work. What implications, after all, does understanding the history of PWL, and the predominance of this metaphilosophical conception in the history of Western thought, have for how we understand the practice(s) of philosophy today? Does recovering the alternative understandings of philosophy as a practice in history necessarily lead to a criticism of contemporary, solely academic or theoretical modes of philosophizing, or is the idea of PWL one which has only historiographical force?
format article
author Matthew Sharpe
Eli Kramer
Michael Chase
author_facet Matthew Sharpe
Eli Kramer
Michael Chase
author_sort Matthew Sharpe
title Pressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis
title_short Pressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis
title_full Pressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis
title_fullStr Pressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis
title_full_unstemmed Pressing Questions for the Philosophical Life in a Time of Crisis
title_sort pressing questions for the philosophical life in a time of crisis
publisher University of Warsaw
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fc0abfdc5e0743a5ba90dc6f30ee3753
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewsharpe pressingquestionsforthephilosophicallifeinatimeofcrisis
AT elikramer pressingquestionsforthephilosophicallifeinatimeofcrisis
AT michaelchase pressingquestionsforthephilosophicallifeinatimeofcrisis
_version_ 1718409267319406592