Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of measures designed to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on worldwide cancer screening. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE without language...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacKenzie Mayo, MD, Bindu Potugari, MD, Rami Bzeih, DO, Caleb Scheidel, MS, Carolyn Carrera, MD, Richard A. Shellenberger, DO
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fc11ee3c3d404a7fab924fb48a7cfa76
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fc11ee3c3d404a7fab924fb48a7cfa76
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fc11ee3c3d404a7fab924fb48a7cfa762021-11-28T04:36:13ZCancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.2542-454810.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.10.003https://doaj.org/article/fc11ee3c3d404a7fab924fb48a7cfa762021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454821001557https://doaj.org/toc/2542-4548The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of measures designed to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on worldwide cancer screening. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE without language restrictions for studies published between January 1, 2021, and February 10, 2021. Studies selected for full-text review contained data on patients screened for any type of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic and comparison data from a time interval just prior to the pandemic. Data were obtained through dual extraction. All the included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed on 13 studies: 7 on screening mammography, 5 on colon cancer screening, and 3 on cervical cancer screening. Two of our studies reported on more than one type of cancer screening. The screening outcomes were reported as pooled incidence rate ratios using the inverse variance method and random effects models. All studies included in our meta-analysis reported the number of patients screened for cancer in defined time intervals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that the pooled incidence rate ratios were significantly lower for screening during the COVID-19 pandemic for breast cancer (0.63; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.77; P<.001), colon cancer (0.11; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.24; P<.001), and cervical cancer (0.10; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.24; P<.001). These findings may add further morbidity and mortality to this public health crisis.MacKenzie Mayo, MDBindu Potugari, MDRami Bzeih, DOCaleb Scheidel, MSCarolyn Carrera, MDRichard A. Shellenberger, DOElsevierarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENMayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, Vol 5, Iss 6, Pp 1109-1117 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
MacKenzie Mayo, MD
Bindu Potugari, MD
Rami Bzeih, DO
Caleb Scheidel, MS
Carolyn Carrera, MD
Richard A. Shellenberger, DO
Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
description The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of measures designed to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on worldwide cancer screening. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE without language restrictions for studies published between January 1, 2021, and February 10, 2021. Studies selected for full-text review contained data on patients screened for any type of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic and comparison data from a time interval just prior to the pandemic. Data were obtained through dual extraction. All the included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed on 13 studies: 7 on screening mammography, 5 on colon cancer screening, and 3 on cervical cancer screening. Two of our studies reported on more than one type of cancer screening. The screening outcomes were reported as pooled incidence rate ratios using the inverse variance method and random effects models. All studies included in our meta-analysis reported the number of patients screened for cancer in defined time intervals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that the pooled incidence rate ratios were significantly lower for screening during the COVID-19 pandemic for breast cancer (0.63; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.77; P<.001), colon cancer (0.11; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.24; P<.001), and cervical cancer (0.10; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.24; P<.001). These findings may add further morbidity and mortality to this public health crisis.
format article
author MacKenzie Mayo, MD
Bindu Potugari, MD
Rami Bzeih, DO
Caleb Scheidel, MS
Carolyn Carrera, MD
Richard A. Shellenberger, DO
author_facet MacKenzie Mayo, MD
Bindu Potugari, MD
Rami Bzeih, DO
Caleb Scheidel, MS
Carolyn Carrera, MD
Richard A. Shellenberger, DO
author_sort MacKenzie Mayo, MD
title Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_short Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_full Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_sort cancer screening during the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fc11ee3c3d404a7fab924fb48a7cfa76
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenziemayomd cancerscreeningduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bindupotugarimd cancerscreeningduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramibzeihdo cancerscreeningduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT calebscheidelms cancerscreeningduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carolyncarreramd cancerscreeningduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT richardashellenbergerdo cancerscreeningduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718408357382979584