USEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Objective:To determine accuracy of infrared thermometer for detection of fever as compared to mercury thermometer. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place andDuration of Study: Department of Medicine, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, fromMaytoJun 2020. Methodology: All willing adult...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nauman Sarir Khan, Abdul Rehman Arshad, Muhammad Tariq, Maqsood Khan, Muhammad Bilal Siddique, Khawar Shabbir
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2020
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fc16008b26e144fc84c4d1304bb60cda
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fc16008b26e144fc84c4d1304bb60cda
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fc16008b26e144fc84c4d1304bb60cda2021-12-02T17:41:38ZUSEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC0030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/fc16008b26e144fc84c4d1304bb60cda2020-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/5319https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective:To determine accuracy of infrared thermometer for detection of fever as compared to mercury thermometer. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place andDuration of Study: Department of Medicine, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, fromMaytoJun 2020. Methodology: All willing adult patients reporting to the fever desk were selected by consecutivesampling. Exclusion criteria included any dermatological condition affecting forehead and unwillingness. Forehead temperature was first checked twice using Kinlee FT3010 infrared thermometer. Axillary temperature was then recorded using a standard clinical mercury thermometer. Results: There were 538 patients, including 251 (46.65%) males and 287 (53.35%) females, aged 46.76± 12.44 years. Median temperatures recorded with infrared and mercury thermometers were 97.00°F (interquartile range: 95.10-97.80°F)and 98.30°F (interquartile range: 98.00-98.90°F) respectively (p<0.001). Intra-class correlation was 0.143 (95% CI -0.052, 0.323). There was a weak to moderate correlation (R: 0.366; p<0.001) between temperatures recorded by the two techniques. ROC curveanalysis for temperatures recorded by infrared thermometerrevealed an area under curve of 0.725 at a threshold of 98.6°F and 0.746 at a threshold of 100.4°F defined by mercury thermometer. Infrared thermometer had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 13.61% and 9.38%, 97.95% and 99.80%, 71.43% and 75.00%, and 75.10% and 95.57% for thresholds of 98.6°F and 100.4°F respectively. Conclusion: Infraredthermometer underestimatestemperatures recorded by mercury thermometer. Limits of agreement are too broad, indicating inconsistency in measurements. A significantly lower threshold is required to improve the sensitivity of Infrared thermometerin picking up fever.Nauman Sarir KhanAbdul Rehman ArshadMuhammad TariqMaqsood KhanMuhammad Bilal SiddiqueKhawar ShabbirArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticleagreementinfrared thermometryskin temperaturetemperature measurementthermometryMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 70, Iss 2, Pp 597-602 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic agreement
infrared thermometry
skin temperature
temperature measurement
thermometry
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle agreement
infrared thermometry
skin temperature
temperature measurement
thermometry
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Nauman Sarir Khan
Abdul Rehman Arshad
Muhammad Tariq
Maqsood Khan
Muhammad Bilal Siddique
Khawar Shabbir
USEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
description Objective:To determine accuracy of infrared thermometer for detection of fever as compared to mercury thermometer. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place andDuration of Study: Department of Medicine, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, fromMaytoJun 2020. Methodology: All willing adult patients reporting to the fever desk were selected by consecutivesampling. Exclusion criteria included any dermatological condition affecting forehead and unwillingness. Forehead temperature was first checked twice using Kinlee FT3010 infrared thermometer. Axillary temperature was then recorded using a standard clinical mercury thermometer. Results: There were 538 patients, including 251 (46.65%) males and 287 (53.35%) females, aged 46.76± 12.44 years. Median temperatures recorded with infrared and mercury thermometers were 97.00°F (interquartile range: 95.10-97.80°F)and 98.30°F (interquartile range: 98.00-98.90°F) respectively (p<0.001). Intra-class correlation was 0.143 (95% CI -0.052, 0.323). There was a weak to moderate correlation (R: 0.366; p<0.001) between temperatures recorded by the two techniques. ROC curveanalysis for temperatures recorded by infrared thermometerrevealed an area under curve of 0.725 at a threshold of 98.6°F and 0.746 at a threshold of 100.4°F defined by mercury thermometer. Infrared thermometer had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 13.61% and 9.38%, 97.95% and 99.80%, 71.43% and 75.00%, and 75.10% and 95.57% for thresholds of 98.6°F and 100.4°F respectively. Conclusion: Infraredthermometer underestimatestemperatures recorded by mercury thermometer. Limits of agreement are too broad, indicating inconsistency in measurements. A significantly lower threshold is required to improve the sensitivity of Infrared thermometerin picking up fever.
format article
author Nauman Sarir Khan
Abdul Rehman Arshad
Muhammad Tariq
Maqsood Khan
Muhammad Bilal Siddique
Khawar Shabbir
author_facet Nauman Sarir Khan
Abdul Rehman Arshad
Muhammad Tariq
Maqsood Khan
Muhammad Bilal Siddique
Khawar Shabbir
author_sort Nauman Sarir Khan
title USEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
title_short USEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
title_full USEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
title_fullStr USEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
title_full_unstemmed USEFULNESS OF FOREHEAD INFRARED THERMOMETERS TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR FEVER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
title_sort usefulness of forehead infrared thermometers to screen patients for fever during covid-19 pandemic
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/fc16008b26e144fc84c4d1304bb60cda
work_keys_str_mv AT naumansarirkhan usefulnessofforeheadinfraredthermometerstoscreenpatientsforfeverduringcovid19pandemic
AT abdulrehmanarshad usefulnessofforeheadinfraredthermometerstoscreenpatientsforfeverduringcovid19pandemic
AT muhammadtariq usefulnessofforeheadinfraredthermometerstoscreenpatientsforfeverduringcovid19pandemic
AT maqsoodkhan usefulnessofforeheadinfraredthermometerstoscreenpatientsforfeverduringcovid19pandemic
AT muhammadbilalsiddique usefulnessofforeheadinfraredthermometerstoscreenpatientsforfeverduringcovid19pandemic
AT khawarshabbir usefulnessofforeheadinfraredthermometerstoscreenpatientsforfeverduringcovid19pandemic
_version_ 1718379683359227904