Quantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case

ABSTRACT Laboratory models are a cornerstone of modern microbiology, but the accuracy of these models has not been systematically evaluated. As a result, researchers often choose models based on intuition or incomplete data. We propose a general quantitative framework to assess model accuracy from R...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel M. Cornforth, Frances L. Diggle, Jeffrey A. Melvin, Jennifer M. Bomberger, Marvin Whiteley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fc699cfcf8404da5a9ed7966015b5d96
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fc699cfcf8404da5a9ed7966015b5d96
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fc699cfcf8404da5a9ed7966015b5d962021-11-15T15:56:58ZQuantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case10.1128/mBio.03042-192150-7511https://doaj.org/article/fc699cfcf8404da5a9ed7966015b5d962020-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.03042-19https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT Laboratory models are a cornerstone of modern microbiology, but the accuracy of these models has not been systematically evaluated. As a result, researchers often choose models based on intuition or incomplete data. We propose a general quantitative framework to assess model accuracy from RNA sequencing data and use this framework to evaluate models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis (CF) lung infection. We found that an in vitro synthetic CF sputum medium model and a CF airway epithelial cell model had the highest genome-wide accuracy but underperformed on distinct functional categories, including porins and polyamine biosynthesis for the synthetic sputum medium and protein synthesis for the epithelial cell model. We identified 211 “elusive” genes that were not mimicked in a reference strain grown in any laboratory model but found that many were captured by using a clinical isolate. These methods provide researchers with an evidence-based foundation to select and improve laboratory models. IMPORTANCE Laboratory models have become a cornerstone of modern microbiology. However, the accuracy of even the most commonly used models has never been evaluated. Here, we propose a quantitative framework based on gene expression data to evaluate model performance and apply it to models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis lung infection. We discovered that these models captured different aspects of P. aeruginosa infection physiology, and we identify which functional categories are and are not captured by each model. These methods will provide researchers with a solid basis to choose among laboratory models depending on the scientific question of interest and will help improve existing experimental models.Daniel M. CornforthFrances L. DiggleJeffrey A. MelvinJennifer M. BombergerMarvin WhiteleyAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticlePseudomonas aeruginosamodeltranscriptomicscystic fibrosisinfectionMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Pseudomonas aeruginosa
model
transcriptomics
cystic fibrosis
infection
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle Pseudomonas aeruginosa
model
transcriptomics
cystic fibrosis
infection
Microbiology
QR1-502
Daniel M. Cornforth
Frances L. Diggle
Jeffrey A. Melvin
Jennifer M. Bomberger
Marvin Whiteley
Quantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case
description ABSTRACT Laboratory models are a cornerstone of modern microbiology, but the accuracy of these models has not been systematically evaluated. As a result, researchers often choose models based on intuition or incomplete data. We propose a general quantitative framework to assess model accuracy from RNA sequencing data and use this framework to evaluate models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis (CF) lung infection. We found that an in vitro synthetic CF sputum medium model and a CF airway epithelial cell model had the highest genome-wide accuracy but underperformed on distinct functional categories, including porins and polyamine biosynthesis for the synthetic sputum medium and protein synthesis for the epithelial cell model. We identified 211 “elusive” genes that were not mimicked in a reference strain grown in any laboratory model but found that many were captured by using a clinical isolate. These methods provide researchers with an evidence-based foundation to select and improve laboratory models. IMPORTANCE Laboratory models have become a cornerstone of modern microbiology. However, the accuracy of even the most commonly used models has never been evaluated. Here, we propose a quantitative framework based on gene expression data to evaluate model performance and apply it to models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis lung infection. We discovered that these models captured different aspects of P. aeruginosa infection physiology, and we identify which functional categories are and are not captured by each model. These methods will provide researchers with a solid basis to choose among laboratory models depending on the scientific question of interest and will help improve existing experimental models.
format article
author Daniel M. Cornforth
Frances L. Diggle
Jeffrey A. Melvin
Jennifer M. Bomberger
Marvin Whiteley
author_facet Daniel M. Cornforth
Frances L. Diggle
Jeffrey A. Melvin
Jennifer M. Bomberger
Marvin Whiteley
author_sort Daniel M. Cornforth
title Quantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case
title_short Quantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case
title_full Quantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case
title_fullStr Quantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Framework for Model Evaluation in Microbiology Research Using <italic toggle="yes">Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and Cystic Fibrosis Infection as a Test Case
title_sort quantitative framework for model evaluation in microbiology research using <italic toggle="yes">pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and cystic fibrosis infection as a test case
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/fc699cfcf8404da5a9ed7966015b5d96
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmcornforth quantitativeframeworkformodelevaluationinmicrobiologyresearchusingitalictoggleyespseudomonasaeruginosaitalicandcysticfibrosisinfectionasatestcase
AT francesldiggle quantitativeframeworkformodelevaluationinmicrobiologyresearchusingitalictoggleyespseudomonasaeruginosaitalicandcysticfibrosisinfectionasatestcase
AT jeffreyamelvin quantitativeframeworkformodelevaluationinmicrobiologyresearchusingitalictoggleyespseudomonasaeruginosaitalicandcysticfibrosisinfectionasatestcase
AT jennifermbomberger quantitativeframeworkformodelevaluationinmicrobiologyresearchusingitalictoggleyespseudomonasaeruginosaitalicandcysticfibrosisinfectionasatestcase
AT marvinwhiteley quantitativeframeworkformodelevaluationinmicrobiologyresearchusingitalictoggleyespseudomonasaeruginosaitalicandcysticfibrosisinfectionasatestcase
_version_ 1718427067763130368