Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region

Abstract The reproducibility of scanning in the periorbital region with 3D technology to enable objective evaluations of surgical treatment in the periorbital region was assessed. Facial 3D-scans of 15 volunteers were captured at different time points with a handheld Artec Space Spider structured li...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maria H. J. Hollander, Joep Kraeima, Anne M. L. Meesters, Konstantina Delli, Arjan Vissink, Johan Jansma, Rutger H. Schepers
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/fc6de4b312944e7584b5187985df2771
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:fc6de4b312944e7584b5187985df2771
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:fc6de4b312944e7584b5187985df27712021-12-02T12:09:45ZReproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region10.1038/s41598-021-83335-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/fc6de4b312944e7584b5187985df27712021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83335-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The reproducibility of scanning in the periorbital region with 3D technology to enable objective evaluations of surgical treatment in the periorbital region was assessed. Facial 3D-scans of 15 volunteers were captured at different time points with a handheld Artec Space Spider structured light scanner. Two scans were made with a one minute interval and repeated after 1 year; for both a natural head position and with the head in a fixation-device. On assessing the area between the eyelashes and eyebrows, the medians of the average deviations between the various cross-sections of the one minute interval 3D-scans ranged from 0.17 to 0.21 mm at baseline, and from 0.10 to 0.11 mm when the minute-interval scanning was repeated one year later. The systematic differences when scanning in a natural head position and fixated position were comparable. The reproducibility of the 3D processing was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The repeated scanning deviations (baseline versus one year data) were well within the accepted clinical threshold of 1 mm. Scanning with a hand-held 3D-scanning device (Artec Space Spider) is a promising tool to assess changes in the periorbital region following surgical treatment since the median deviations are well below the clinically accepted 1 mm measuring error, for both the natural head and fixated positions.Maria H. J. HollanderJoep KraeimaAnne M. L. MeestersKonstantina DelliArjan VissinkJohan JansmaRutger H. SchepersNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Maria H. J. Hollander Joep Kraeima Anne M. L. Meesters Konstantina Delli Arjan Vissink Johan Jansma Rutger H. Schepers Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region
description	Abstract The reproducibility of scanning in the periorbital region with 3D technology to enable objective evaluations of surgical treatment in the periorbital region was assessed. Facial 3D-scans of 15 volunteers were captured at different time points with a handheld Artec Space Spider structured light scanner. Two scans were made with a one minute interval and repeated after 1 year; for both a natural head position and with the head in a fixation-device. On assessing the area between the eyelashes and eyebrows, the medians of the average deviations between the various cross-sections of the one minute interval 3D-scans ranged from 0.17 to 0.21 mm at baseline, and from 0.10 to 0.11 mm when the minute-interval scanning was repeated one year later. The systematic differences when scanning in a natural head position and fixated position were comparable. The reproducibility of the 3D processing was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The repeated scanning deviations (baseline versus one year data) were well within the accepted clinical threshold of 1 mm. Scanning with a hand-held 3D-scanning device (Artec Space Spider) is a promising tool to assess changes in the periorbital region following surgical treatment since the median deviations are well below the clinically accepted 1 mm measuring error, for both the natural head and fixated positions.
format	article
author	Maria H. J. Hollander Joep Kraeima Anne M. L. Meesters Konstantina Delli Arjan Vissink Johan Jansma Rutger H. Schepers
author_facet	Maria H. J. Hollander Joep Kraeima Anne M. L. Meesters Konstantina Delli Arjan Vissink Johan Jansma Rutger H. Schepers
author_sort	Maria H. J. Hollander
title	Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region
title_short	Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region
title_full	Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region
title_fullStr	Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region
title_full_unstemmed	Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region
title_sort	reproducibility of 3d scanning in the periorbital region
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/fc6de4b312944e7584b5187985df2771
work_keys_str_mv	AT mariahjhollander reproducibilityof3dscanningintheperiorbitalregion AT joepkraeima reproducibilityof3dscanningintheperiorbitalregion AT annemlmeesters reproducibilityof3dscanningintheperiorbitalregion AT konstantinadelli reproducibilityof3dscanningintheperiorbitalregion AT arjanvissink reproducibilityof3dscanningintheperiorbitalregion AT johanjansma reproducibilityof3dscanningintheperiorbitalregion AT rutgerhschepers reproducibilityof3dscanningintheperiorbitalregion
_version_	1718394668977225728

Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region

Ejemplares similares