A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
<h4>Objectives</h4>This study provides insights into the validity and acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) and profile-case Best Worst Scaling (BWS) methods for eliciting preferences for health care in a priority-setting context.<h4>Methods</h4>An adult sample (N...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Jennifer A Whitty, Ruth Walker, Xanthe Golenko, Julie Ratcliffe |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/fc8bcd65fbd04433862fa14d90a6d6d3 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Using best-worst scaling method to examine consumers’ value preferences: A multidimensional perspective
par: Shehely Parvin, et autres
Publié: (2016) -
Egypt beyond COVID 19, the best and the worst-case scenarios
par: Mohamed Ramadan A. Rezk, et autres
Publié: (2020) -
Investigating awareness, fear and control associated with norovirus and other pathogens and pollutants using best–worst scaling
par: Kata Farkas, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Differential effects of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness on worst- and best- school subjects
par: Toru Ishihara, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Temporal Assessment of Self-Regulated Learning by Mining Students’ Think-Aloud Protocols
par: Lyn Lim, et autres
Publié: (2021)