Staropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita?
Old Polabian theonyms *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadjectival nouns or compounds? The article reinterpretes the morphological structure of a series of Old Polabian theonyms: *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ. In the literature, they are quite unanimously considered to...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | DE EN FR PL RU |
| Publicado: |
Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fca3892293b24ebe90174dcdf9b073b6 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fca3892293b24ebe90174dcdf9b073b6 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fca3892293b24ebe90174dcdf9b073b62021-11-27T13:01:34ZStaropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita?10.12797/LV.10.2015.20.091896-21222392-1226https://doaj.org/article/fca3892293b24ebe90174dcdf9b073b62015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/lv/article/view/2720https://doaj.org/toc/1896-2122https://doaj.org/toc/2392-1226 Old Polabian theonyms *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadjectival nouns or compounds? The article reinterpretes the morphological structure of a series of Old Polabian theonyms: *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ. In the literature, they are quite unanimously considered to be nominal compounds with the element *vitъ ‘dominus, potens’ but this author shows, based on a distribution analysis of the formant *-(o/e)vitъ in the Slavonic languages, that they should be viewed as suffixal derivatives in *-ov-itъ (in the attributive-possessive function), and from the formal point of view, as nouns coined from adjectival bases. The paper concludes with the supposition that theonyms created using this formula were a dialectal innovation and were most likely limited to Old Polabian mythological nomenclature. Probably, they were substitute names and, being appellative epithets, they only became independent in the function of theonyms. Michał ŁuczyńskiKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticleteonimia słowiańskaantroponimiadeadiectivumcompositumnazewnictwo mitologiczneLanguage. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammarP101-410DEENFRPLRULingVaria, Vol 10, Iss 20 (2015) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
DE EN FR PL RU |
| topic |
teonimia słowiańska antroponimia deadiectivum compositum nazewnictwo mitologiczne Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 |
| spellingShingle |
teonimia słowiańska antroponimia deadiectivum compositum nazewnictwo mitologiczne Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 Michał Łuczyński Staropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita? |
| description |
Old Polabian theonyms *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadjectival nouns or compounds?
The article reinterpretes the morphological structure of a series of Old Polabian theonyms: *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ. In the literature, they are quite unanimously considered to be nominal compounds with the element *vitъ ‘dominus, potens’ but this author shows, based on a distribution analysis of the formant *-(o/e)vitъ in the Slavonic languages, that they should be viewed as suffixal derivatives in *-ov-itъ (in the attributive-possessive function), and from the formal point of view, as nouns coined from adjectival bases. The paper concludes with the supposition that theonyms created using this formula were a dialectal innovation and were most likely limited to Old Polabian mythological nomenclature. Probably, they were substitute names and, being appellative epithets, they only became independent in the function of theonyms.
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Michał Łuczyński |
| author_facet |
Michał Łuczyński |
| author_sort |
Michał Łuczyński |
| title |
Staropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita? |
| title_short |
Staropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita? |
| title_full |
Staropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita? |
| title_fullStr |
Staropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Staropołabskie teonimy *Svętovitъ, *Jarovitъ, *Rujevitъ, *Borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita? |
| title_sort |
staropołabskie teonimy *svętovitъ, *jarovitъ, *rujevitъ, *borovitъ: deadiectiva czy composita? |
| publisher |
Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/fca3892293b24ebe90174dcdf9b073b6 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT michałłuczynski staropołabskieteonimysvetovitʺjarovitʺrujevitʺborovitʺdeadiectivaczycomposita |
| _version_ |
1718408903332462592 |