Civilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities

This paper discusses the merits and problems of civilizational perspectives on Japanese history, with particular reference to the task of combining a comparative approach with valid points made by those who see Japan as a highly self-contained cultural world. After a brief consideration of Claude Lé...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jóhann Páll Árnason
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CS
EN
SK
Publicado: Karolinum Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fcae304ee4e047c193128945ec1998b6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fcae304ee4e047c193128945ec1998b6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fcae304ee4e047c193128945ec1998b62021-11-29T09:26:05ZCivilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities2336-35251804-061610.14712/23363525.2021.20https://doaj.org/article/fcae304ee4e047c193128945ec1998b62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23363525.2021.20https://doaj.org/toc/1804-0616https://doaj.org/toc/2336-3525This paper discusses the merits and problems of civilizational perspectives on Japanese history, with particular reference to the task of combining a comparative approach with valid points made by those who see Japan as a highly self-contained cultural world. After a brief consideration of Claude Lévi-Strauss’s reflections on Japan, the central section of the paper deals with Shmuel Eisenstadt’s work. His conception of Japan as a distinctive civilization characterized by pre-axial patterns is rejected on the grounds that the native mode of thought which he proposes to describe is more plausibly interpreted as an offshoot of Chinese traditions, although a notably autonomous and historically changing one. The transmission of Daoism to Japan, although much less explicit than the reception of Confucianism and Buddhism, was of crucial importance. That said, Eisenstadt’s concrete analyses of Japanese ways to transform foreign inputs are often detailed and insightful, and his comments on the relationship between culture and institutions raise important questions, although they must in many cases be reformulated in more historical terms. The paper discusses the genesis, dynamics and collapse of the Tokugawa regime (1600–1868), and concludes with reflections on Japanese modernity, up to and including its present crisis.Jóhann Páll ÁrnasonKarolinum PressarticleSociology (General)HM401-1281CSENSKHistoricka Sociologie, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 105-132 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CS
EN
SK
topic Sociology (General)
HM401-1281
spellingShingle Sociology (General)
HM401-1281
Jóhann Páll Árnason
Civilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities
description This paper discusses the merits and problems of civilizational perspectives on Japanese history, with particular reference to the task of combining a comparative approach with valid points made by those who see Japan as a highly self-contained cultural world. After a brief consideration of Claude Lévi-Strauss’s reflections on Japan, the central section of the paper deals with Shmuel Eisenstadt’s work. His conception of Japan as a distinctive civilization characterized by pre-axial patterns is rejected on the grounds that the native mode of thought which he proposes to describe is more plausibly interpreted as an offshoot of Chinese traditions, although a notably autonomous and historically changing one. The transmission of Daoism to Japan, although much less explicit than the reception of Confucianism and Buddhism, was of crucial importance. That said, Eisenstadt’s concrete analyses of Japanese ways to transform foreign inputs are often detailed and insightful, and his comments on the relationship between culture and institutions raise important questions, although they must in many cases be reformulated in more historical terms. The paper discusses the genesis, dynamics and collapse of the Tokugawa regime (1600–1868), and concludes with reflections on Japanese modernity, up to and including its present crisis.
format article
author Jóhann Páll Árnason
author_facet Jóhann Páll Árnason
author_sort Jóhann Páll Árnason
title Civilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities
title_short Civilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities
title_full Civilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities
title_fullStr Civilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities
title_full_unstemmed Civilizational Aspects of Japanese History: Continuities and Discontinuities
title_sort civilizational aspects of japanese history: continuities and discontinuities
publisher Karolinum Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fcae304ee4e047c193128945ec1998b6
work_keys_str_mv AT johannpallarnason civilizationalaspectsofjapanesehistorycontinuitiesanddiscontinuities
_version_ 1718407442662948864