Conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events

Abstract Widespread shifts in phenological events in response to climate change have inspired phenological monitoring programs and new methods for analyzing sparse phenological data. For example, the Weibull distribution is increasingly used to estimate the dates of hard‐to‐observe phenological even...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amy M. Iler, Parris T. Humphrey, Jane E. Ogilvie, Paul J. CaraDonna
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fcbd5b2c24b04f39b0f7f193c2c0a2ac
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fcbd5b2c24b04f39b0f7f193c2c0a2ac
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fcbd5b2c24b04f39b0f7f193c2c0a2ac2021-11-29T07:06:42ZConceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events2150-892510.1002/ecs2.3828https://doaj.org/article/fcbd5b2c24b04f39b0f7f193c2c0a2ac2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3828https://doaj.org/toc/2150-8925Abstract Widespread shifts in phenological events in response to climate change have inspired phenological monitoring programs and new methods for analyzing sparse phenological data. For example, the Weibull distribution is increasingly used to estimate the dates of hard‐to‐observe phenological events, such as first and last flowering dates, in sparsely or unsystematically sampled data sets. In contrast, recent application of the Weibull estimator to an intensely and systematically sampled flowering phenology data set unexpectedly found different results than a previous analysis of the observed dates; at issue is whether different aspects of phenological curves shift uniformly or disparately. We used this case study to (1) raise conceptual and technical issues around when and how to infer phenological events using Weibull (or other) estimates, and (2) re‐analyze the data set in question with these considerations in mind. Our re‐analysis using the Weibull estimator shows that first, peak, and last flowering dates shift disparately through time, supporting the original analysis of the observed dates. We show that off‐the‐shelf usage of statistical estimators to generalize about an unsampled population may be inappropriate without considering how well sampled the focal study population is and how biological features such as habitat heterogeneity influence the natural scope of the unsampled population.Amy M. IlerParris T. HumphreyJane E. OgilviePaul J. CaraDonnaWileyarticleclimate changeflowering phenologyhabitat heterogeneityphenologysamplingWeibull distributionEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosphere, Vol 12, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic climate change
flowering phenology
habitat heterogeneity
phenology
sampling
Weibull distribution
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle climate change
flowering phenology
habitat heterogeneity
phenology
sampling
Weibull distribution
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Amy M. Iler
Parris T. Humphrey
Jane E. Ogilvie
Paul J. CaraDonna
Conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events
description Abstract Widespread shifts in phenological events in response to climate change have inspired phenological monitoring programs and new methods for analyzing sparse phenological data. For example, the Weibull distribution is increasingly used to estimate the dates of hard‐to‐observe phenological events, such as first and last flowering dates, in sparsely or unsystematically sampled data sets. In contrast, recent application of the Weibull estimator to an intensely and systematically sampled flowering phenology data set unexpectedly found different results than a previous analysis of the observed dates; at issue is whether different aspects of phenological curves shift uniformly or disparately. We used this case study to (1) raise conceptual and technical issues around when and how to infer phenological events using Weibull (or other) estimates, and (2) re‐analyze the data set in question with these considerations in mind. Our re‐analysis using the Weibull estimator shows that first, peak, and last flowering dates shift disparately through time, supporting the original analysis of the observed dates. We show that off‐the‐shelf usage of statistical estimators to generalize about an unsampled population may be inappropriate without considering how well sampled the focal study population is and how biological features such as habitat heterogeneity influence the natural scope of the unsampled population.
format article
author Amy M. Iler
Parris T. Humphrey
Jane E. Ogilvie
Paul J. CaraDonna
author_facet Amy M. Iler
Parris T. Humphrey
Jane E. Ogilvie
Paul J. CaraDonna
author_sort Amy M. Iler
title Conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events
title_short Conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events
title_full Conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events
title_fullStr Conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events
title_full_unstemmed Conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events
title_sort conceptual and practical issues limit the utility of statistical estimators of phenological events
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fcbd5b2c24b04f39b0f7f193c2c0a2ac
work_keys_str_mv AT amymiler conceptualandpracticalissueslimittheutilityofstatisticalestimatorsofphenologicalevents
AT parristhumphrey conceptualandpracticalissueslimittheutilityofstatisticalestimatorsofphenologicalevents
AT janeeogilvie conceptualandpracticalissueslimittheutilityofstatisticalestimatorsofphenologicalevents
AT pauljcaradonna conceptualandpracticalissueslimittheutilityofstatisticalestimatorsofphenologicalevents
_version_ 1718407564655329280